[Qgis-developer] Help us plan for QGIS 3.0

[Nathan Woodrow]

+1 to 2.16 and then 3.0

On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:26 pm Martin Dobias <wonder.sk at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Nyall Dawson <nyall.dawson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On 18 January 2016 at 09:03, Tim Sutton <tim at qgis.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear QGIS Developers
> >>
> >>
> >> For some time now we have been talking about moving to 3.0. The PSC is
> looking for proposals on how to manage the process of moving to QGIS 3.0.
> For a little more context please see the blog post I have made [1]. Once we
> have all the proposals in (please see the example from Matthias Kuhn at the
> bottom of the aforementioned post and keep it nice & simple)  we will
> collate them and then select one (or a hybrid of several) and share those
> plans with the broader community. I will make all the proposals publicly
> available and we will make the final decision in consultation with the
> developer community.
> >>
> >
> > Great summary Tim! Thanks for helping push this along.
> >
> > It's probably no surprise (since Matthias and I have spoken at length
> > regarding this), but I'm in favour of Proposal 1. I just don't believe
> > we have the resources to support any form of parallel development like
> > proposal 2 requires.
>
> I am also in favour of proposal 1 (release 2.16 and then 3.0) as it
> has a good balance in terms of how much time in advance 3.0 is
> announced, how much time is there to adjust to py3/qt5, and how much
> extra time can be used for API breaking changes.
>
> Cheers
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/attachments/20160119/0f731c7a/attachment.html>