[Qgis-developer] The first column in the attribute table

[Matthias Kuhn]

Sure, you are right,

Sorry, the commit message was wrong but the code is ok.

Matthias

On 06/16/2016 09:28 AM, Neumann, Andreas wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> Column header numbers? Aren't we discussing row header numbers?
> 
> Andreas
> 
> On 2016-06-16 09:25, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
> 
>> Hi Andreas
>>
>> It took me less time than it took me to write this email
>>
>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/9f704d6e92b922555bddb3a5a648edaac2aedf34
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> On 06/16/2016 09:18 AM, Neumann, Andreas wrote:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> If there are no negative side effects - I'd like to see the same
>>> behaviour like in spreadsheets - an always ascending list, starting from
>>> 1 - regardless of the order of the rows.
>>>
>>> Would this be a lot of work to change this?
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> On 2016-06-16 09:06, Matthias Kuhn wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>>
>>>> I always thought that they are the feature ID. But not even that, often
>>>> they are "feature id - 1", but that's not guaranteed at all.
>>>>
>>>> We could make it match the feature id. Or the current index in the table
>>>> like you propose.
>>>>
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>> On 06/16/2016 08:56 AM, Neumann, Andreas wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to discuss an issue in the attribute table.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is this very first column (not stored in the provider) which
>>>>> lists
>>>>> the features as they appear in the provider (by default, if not
>>>>> re-ordered by the user). What are these values? Some internal ID not
>>>>> present in the data? Or some internal ID from the qt table widget?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am just wondering, because regarding this first column, QGIS behaves
>>>>> different from Spreadsheets.
>>>>>
>>>>> When you reorder the table in QGIS, this very first column becomes "out
>>>>> of order" - spreadsheets always display 1 to xxx - nicely ordered -
>>>>> regardless of the sort order. Could QGIS be aligned to the behaviour of
>>>>> spreadsheets or is there a particular reason not do so? I think, from a
>>>>> users perspective, because these numbers are not present in the data,
>>>>> that it would be more useful if they always stay ordered from 1 to xxx
>>>>> or 0 to xxx, regardless of sorting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your feedback.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andreas
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>>>>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>>> <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>>>> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Qgis-developer mailing list
>>>> Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> <mailto:Qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>>> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>  
> 
>  
> 
>