<div>FYI: A poll on the forums about its future </div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://forum.qgis.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=9025">http://forum.qgis.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=9025</a></div><div><br></div><div>Best wishes,</div>
<div>Anita</div><div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Barry Rowlingson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:b.rowlingson@lancaster.ac.uk">b.rowlingson@lancaster.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="im">On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Maxim Dubinin <<a href="mailto:sim@gis-lab.info">sim@gis-lab.info</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> How can you divert all these people to SE which has stunning 131<br>
> topics tagged with QGIS? Compare it with 3767 topics on the forum.<br>
<br>
</div> If SE had existed from before the forum, it would now have 3767 topics :)<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> If you think SE is much better - ok, let it outrun forum, so that the<br>
> latter will die out gradually.<br>
<br>
</div> +1 - I'd prefer persuasion to compulsion. Perhaps the forum should<br>
advertise SE for a while, as an alternative, and maybe even suggest<br>
posting to both to see how the response time and quality varies?<br>
<br>
The R statistics project is currently going through this sort of<br>
thing - only instead of a forum the main source of questions is a<br>
1990-s era mailing list :) No images, no proper threading... euurgh!<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Barry<br>
</font><div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Qgis-developer mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>