<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7654.12">
<TITLE>RE: New QGIS logo</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I always thought it was one of the best icons and logos I'd ever seen.<BR>
Glad I'm not the only one who likes it ;)<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
> -----Original Message-----<BR>
> From: qgis-community-team-bounces@lists.osgeo.org on behalf of Mars Sjoden<BR>
> Sent: Sun 11/27/2011 9:32 AM<BR>
> To: qgis-community<BR>
> Cc: qgis-developer<BR>
> Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] Re: [Qgis-community-team] New QGIS logo<BR>
> <BR>
> I am just wondering what is wrong with the current QGIS icon/symbol?<BR>
><BR>
> Are there some complaints about it's design?<BR>
><BR>
> It currently seems simple, scalable, representative,<BR>
> and recognizable amongst those who currently are using QGIS.<BR>
><BR>
> signed,<BR>
><BR>
> Devil's Advocate</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>