+1 to change. Most people reporting bugs would also not know how trivial or non trivial the fix would be.<div><br></div><div>- Nathan<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Alister Hood <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Alister.Hood@synergine.com">Alister.Hood@synergine.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-NZ" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Hi everyone,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">The bug reporting guidelines at <a href="http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Bugreports" target="_blank">
http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/Bugreports</a> define “low” priority as “a problem which doesn't affect QGIS usefulness, and is presumably trivial to fix”.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">I think this description is a little confusing and we should delete the second part.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Something can be low priority but non-trivial to fix. The definitions for the other levels of priority do not say anything about how easy something is to fix.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Does anyone disagree with changing this?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Regards,<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Alister<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Qgis-developer mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>