Most of the history looks good now that both the git and svn repos are listed, although I would think you really only need the git one since it contains the whole history.<div><br></div><div>I really like this view <a href="https://www.ohloh.net/p/3663/contributors/15732465252554">https://www.ohloh.net/p/3663/contributors/15732465252554</a> and <a href="https://www.ohloh.net/p/3663/map">https://www.ohloh.net/p/3663/map</a></div>
<div><br></div><div>- Nathan </div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Martin Dobias <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wonder.sk@gmail.com">wonder.sk@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Tyler Mitchell <<a href="mailto:info@locatepress.com">info@locatepress.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> You should be able to have both repositories listed on ohloh, I think I did it<br>
> with other sites before. Only git was enlisted. I assume someone removed<br>
> the SVN enlistment for a reason, but I just added it back in. Feel free to remove<br>
> it if I shouldn't have added it, but I think it should give you back the history without<br>
> too much grief with overlaps. Will take a while to show up.<br>
<br>
</div>Our git repository contains the whole project history including the<br>
period of usage of SVN. So it may be just necessary to regenerate the<br>
statistics completely?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Martin<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Qgis-developer mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>