<p>Any way to find the bottleneck?<br>
It would be real nice to have the new labeling replacing the old one. Redundancy is nice.. but not forever.<br>
:)<br>
I wish i could find the bottleneck myself..<br>
Regards<br>
Werner </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">Am 06.03.2012 13:27 schrieb <<a href="mailto:luca_manganelli@comune.trento.it">luca_manganelli@comune.trento.it</a>>:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<font face="Sans Serif predefinito,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><font color="#990099">-----<a href="mailto:qgis-developer-bounces@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">qgis-developer-bounces@lists.osgeo.org</a> ha scritto: -----</font><br>
<br>>Please test it with an old PC, ora netbooK: in our case it is almost<br>>unusable with <300 polygons.<br>>Also, some of the bugs are pretty serious.<br>>All the best.<br><br>I can confirm the bad performance with new labelling. It's bad on new systems, too (Intel Dual Core 2,6Ghz, 4 GB RAM):<br>
the old labelling engine is MANY times faster.<br><div></div></font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Qgis-developer mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>