<div>Ok, that's what I supposed. We're talking about two different things: your framework and the "geoprocessing framework" that started some time ago. I don't know if Camilo (or others) are still working actively on that.</div>
<div>I can imagine that your experience with the "abstraction level" development for SEXTANTE will be an important plus to the development of such a framework... And I hope the development will converge on one of the twos, otherwise it would a waste of resources.</div>
<div><br></div><div>giovanni</div><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/3/21 Sandro Santilli <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:strk@keybit.net">strk@keybit.net</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 07:03:25PM +0200, Alexander Bruy wrote:<br>
> Hmm... so if I understand correctly now we have two frameworks:<br>
> ProcessingFramework (developed last year by Camilo Polymeris)<br>
> and SEXTANTE framework.<br>
><br>
> I didn't tested SEXTANTE framework yet, but seems we should<br>
> decide and leave only one framework to avoid confusing and<br>
> duplication of work<br>
<br>
</div></div>+1<br>
<br>
It feels like driving drunk whenever starting qgis: every functionality<br>
is duplicated :D<br>
<br>
--strk;<br>
<br>
,------o-.<br>
| __/ | Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 !<br>
| / 2.0 | <a href="http://strk.keybit.net" target="_blank">http://strk.keybit.net</a> - <a href="http://vizzuality.com" target="_blank">http://vizzuality.com</a><br>
`-o------'<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Qgis-developer mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>