<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/3/26 Vincent Picavet <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vincent.ml@oslandia.com">vincent.ml@oslandia.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi,<br>
<br>
Le lundi 26 mars 2012 12:01:20, Paolo Cavallini a écrit :<br>
<div class="im">> Il 26/03/2012 12:01, G. Allegri ha scritto:<br>
> > I think the GPL code is mandatory for the "bridge", eventually. Not all<br>
> > the underlying code requires to be GPL. Am I wrong?<br>
><br>
> I did some research on this, and the conclusion is that import is<br>
> functionally and legally equivalent to linking during compilation, so<br>
> everything that imports qgis must be GPL.<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Thanks for this explanation. I also would like to have a look to pages/articles on the topic.</div><div><br></div><div>giovanni</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">
<br>
</div>+1<br>
<br>
I did some research as well, and came to the same conclusion.<br>
Studies have been done (by the zope group among others), and this is the<br>
general final statement.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Vincent<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Qgis-developer mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>