<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Hi Alexander,<div><br><div><div>On Apr 16, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Alexandre Neto <<a href="mailto:senhor.neto@gmail.com">senhor.neto@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>If I can give my opinion,</div><div><br></div>I don't dislike #50, but I think that that isolated Q won't be strong enough as an Icon.<div><br></div><div>I believe that #91 and #88 (short and long version of the same design) would look quite distinct and sophisticate, would give a great program icon and looks very good printed too.<div>
<br></div><div><a href="http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/91">http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/91</a></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/88">http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/88</a></div>
<div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Actually, I think I prefer this #88 entry upon second review. I agree with your point that the Q icon is more distinct. This also has the "GIS" portion of the logo reduced and offset from the top horizontal line of the "Q" as I was suggesting for #50. I also like the flow of "uantum" off the tail of the Q. Lastly, it looks like a Q. </div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div>I believe that 2.0 deserves a brand new logo, so any of the old logo revamped styles (like #166, #49, #42) don't seam to be a good option.<br><div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div><div>Alexandre Neto<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Régis Haubourg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:regis.haubourg@eau-adour-garonne.fr" target="_blank">regis.haubourg@eau-adour-garonne.fr</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
John C. Tull-2 wrote<br>
<div class="im">> I like the<br>
> <a href="http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/50" target="_blank">http://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/qgis-needs-logo-210397/entries/50</a><br>
> entry, but I would<br>
<br>
</div>+1 for #50. I like also #57, the same but with a background. Both can be<br>
used in different contexts.<br>
régis<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Re-Qgis-psc-Logo-tp5046799p5047346.html" target="_blank">http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Re-Qgis-psc-Logo-tp5046799p5047346.html</a><br>
<div class="im HOEnZb">Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at <a href="http://Nabble.com">Nabble.com</a>.<br>
</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Qgis-developer mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>Qgis-developer mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer<br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>