<html><head/><body><html><head></head><body>Thanks. Please let me know when ready for testing.<br>
All the best.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Matthias Kuhn <matthias.kuhn@gmx.ch> ha scritto:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: sans-serif; margin-top: 0px">Hi Paolo<br /><br />On 30.04.2013 17:44, Paolo Cavallini wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">Hi Matthias,<br />much better indeed. A few notes:<br />* the fixed size of the pies is greyed out, and I donot see how to<br />change it<br /></blockquote>Qt designer erased the slot signals when I changed from toolboxes to<br />tabs. Will be fixed upon next commit.<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">* the option for dimensions are not remembered when closing the window<br /></blockquote>Which dimensions are you referring too.<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">* the default dimension for pies (100) appears too large in most
cases<br /></blockquote>I'll change that to 50, I think that's more reasonable (for mm's, for<br />MapUnits it's the users duty anyway)<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">* wouoldn't it be better to autofill the Max Value field for size scaling?<br /></blockquote>Not sure. A user might want to have a more natural mapping of attributes<br />/ value (e.g. 1cm /100 people) instead of using a maximum value. This<br />should rather be a help than a default value IMO.<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">* if I do not select a fixed size (which, for histograms, does not<br />make much sense),<br /></blockquote>True, I remember I had the same feeling when implementing this last<br />year. I removed the fixed size option for histograms.<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex;
border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">I get:<br />---<br />You did not specify a maximum value for the diagram size. Please<br />specify the<br />attribute and a reference value as a base for scaling in the Tab<br />Diagram / Size.<br />---<br />which should refer to pies only, I guess.<br />* in general, I cannot display a reasonable size of histogram, so it<br />must not be too<br />intuitive, I guess.<br /></blockquote>Last, but most important: Sure. Because I broke it all yesterday. This<br />field in fact is no multiplier, but needs an attribute value reference<br />field (which I removed). So it should say<br /><br />Bar length: Scale linearly, such as the following value matches the<br />specified size:<br />Attribute value [100] = Bar Length [50]<br /><br />Which attribute is selected does not matter here at all. It's really<br />just a helper to get a reasonable default value in this context.<br /><br />I gave it another try.<br /><br
/></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
<a href="http://faunalia.it/pc">http://faunalia.it/pc</a><br>
Sorry for being short</body></html></body></html>