<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>hi martin, thank you very much!<br><br><br><br><div>> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:54:09 +0200<br>> Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] TALK: Legend behaviour<br>> From: wonder.sk@gmail.com<br>> To: sciurusurbanus@hotmail.it<br>> CC: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org<br>> <br>> Hi Niccolo<br>> <br>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Niccolò Marchi<br>> <sciurusurbanus@hotmail.it> wrote:<br>> > Hi all,<br>> > two trivial thoughts about the legend behaviour:<br>> > - I don't know if I'm the only one, but I think the new way to move layers<br>> > with the "dragged image" is less comfortable and precise than the previous.<br>> > I found easier (and hence faster) to manage files in 2.2 legend when<br>> > appeared the line instead of having the actual image that covers the<br>> > destination and doesn't allow to see in a proper way where the file will be<br>> > put. Examples come mainly with: include/exclude a layer from a group or<br>> > moving a layer up to a group if the group is already on top;<br>> <br>> This could be probably changed... but there is also advantage in the<br>> new approach: you always know which layers/groups you move - in 2.2<br>> and earlier the layers that were being moved simply disappeared while<br>> being rendered.<br><br>so, maybe could be a good compromise to keep the actual render but a little more shifted out of the layer list, in order to show better the "destination line"? a sort of mix of the two approaches.<br><br>> <br>> > - other thing: is there a particular reason why, grouping some files, they<br>> > automatically go to the bottom of the legend? could it be a good idea (and<br>> > easy task) to group them where they are?<br>> <br>> Makes sense - implemented in master, c05e5e.<br>> <br>> Regards<br>> Martin<br><br>btw: many thanks!<br></div> </div></body>
</html>