<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Instead of allowing mixed geometries, why not keeping the existing
behavior but allow for additional geometry columns.<br>
<br>
Hence, current API remains: you're still waiting for a type of
geometry, and features have only one geometry.<br>
<br>
But now, you allow to add additional geometries. They could be used
in symbolization by adding rules for the additional geometries.<br>
<br>
Thoughts?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/06/2015 09:59 PM, Matthias Kuhn
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5522E5A4.10106@opengis.ch" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi
On 04/06/2015 12:08 PM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Then, we could add a new "Add record" button to the attribute table
dialog for adding a new (empty) row, which would initially contain no
geometry. That fixes the first part of my issues with geometry
columns.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">That button should already be there for non-geometry layers. I wonder if
it would be sufficient to remove an if-clause around it.
Matthias
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>