<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /></head><body style='font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'>
<p>Hi Richard,</p>
<p>Thank you for dealing with this very annoying issue. It is easy to ruin a good reputation, but not so easy to gain one.</p>
<p>And it is especially annoying if such warnings to not provide enough meaningful information to fix such warnings.</p>
<p>Andreas</p>
<p>On 2015-08-07 10:26, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">On 06-08-15 22:45, Andreas Neumann wrote:<br /><br />
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">So Richard - could you try to follow the Webmaster Tools link and see if<br /> we can get more information?</blockquote>
<br /> Did that. Does NOT give any information...<br /><br /> It seems to have something to do with using httpS when visiting<br /><a href="https://www.qgis.org">https://www.qgis.org</a><br /> because visiting<br /><a href="https://qgis.org">https://qgis.org</a> is ok...<br /><br /> My quess is/was that we had/have spam links in our wiki, but as said,<br /> Google gives you the possibility to list the tainted url's... but that<br /> list is emtpy :-(<br /><br /> I've asked for a new 'review' now from Google. Which can take up 24<br /> hours they say...<br /><br />
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">The other thing to check is if the very recent certificate updates maybe<br /> trigger this warning?</blockquote>
<br /> mmm, should not be the case, I think it is a coincident that Matthias<br /> check/found this.<br /><br /> But I even reverted the certificate now (you should see that it is still<br /> valid until 18-10-15), but according to Google we are still tainted...<br /><br /> Let's see what the which verdict is given by Google-UberMaster after<br /> their review ...<br /><br /> Regards,<br /><br /> Richard Duivenvoorde<br /> _______________________________________________<br /> Qgis-developer mailing list<br /><a href="mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org</a><br /><a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<div> </div>
</body></html>