<div dir="ltr">I also agree that having 2.18 as LTR would be advisable. <div>The switch to 3.x will be very delicate for many organizations, therefore lot of people will stitch to 2.x LTR before doing the big jump. That will mean that 2.14 will be mantained for a very long time if we won't have a new LTR...</div><div><br></div><div>m2c,</div><div>giovanni</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-10-20 10:47 GMT+02:00 Régis Haubourg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:regis.haubourg@gmail.com" target="_blank">regis.haubourg@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><span class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span><br>
><br>
> Let's be more flexible and allow ourself to break the strict rule that<br>
> an LT version can only appear once a year, every third release. Rules<br>
> are here to break where useful/necessary.<br>
<br>
</span>It makes sense to me - let's see, if 2.18 will be a good, stable version<br>
we can promote it to LTR.<br>
<br>
All the best, and thanks.<br>
<span class="m_8676612947243040854HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Paolo Cavallini - <a href="http://www.faunalia.eu" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.faunalia.eu</a><br>
QGIS & PostGIS courses: <a href="http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.faunalia.eu/trainin<wbr>g.html</a><br>
<a href="https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.google.com/trends/<wbr>explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis<wbr>,arcgis</a><br>
</font></span><div class="m_8676612947243040854HOEnZb"><div class="m_8676612947243040854h5">______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Qgis-developer mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
List info: <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/qgis-developer</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman<wbr>/listinfo/qgis-developer</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></span><div class="m_8676612947243040854gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Hi all, </div><div class="m_8676612947243040854gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">same here, users would not understand not having 2.18 as LTR.  </div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div class="m_8676612947243040854gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Régis</div>
</font></span></div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Qgis-developer mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
List info: <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/qgis-<wbr>developer</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/qgis-<wbr>developer</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>