<html><head></head><body><div class="gmail_quote">Il 22 maggio 2017 15:26:46 CEST, Giovanni Manghi <giovanni.manghi@gmail.com> ha scritto:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> At the moment I think it would be best for QGIS Server to live in it's own<br /> repo mainly because it means the development process and cycle can be<br /> different to desktop if that is needed.</blockquote><br /><br /><br /> That's exactly what I would *not* like to see.<br /></blockquote><br /><br />completely agree with Alessandro.<br /><br /><br />cheers!<br /><br />-- G --<br /><hr /><br />QGIS-Developer mailing list<br />QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org<br />List info: <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a><br />Unsubscribe: <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a></pre></blockquote></div><br clear="all">+1<br>
We already discussed extensively about this.<br>
All the best.<br>
-- <br>
Sent from mobile. Sorry for being short</body></html>