<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05.07.2017 11:30, Even Rouault
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:3001788.1ljDidkUaO@even-i700">
<meta name="qrichtext" content="1">
<style type="text/css">
p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; "> </p>
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;">My feeling is that, for good or worse, they are definitely people wanting to have QGIS and "put here the name of your favorite proprietary GIS software" running at the same time, and possibly on the same datasets. This is apparently important in migration scenarios where people aren't ready yet to jump completely to QGIS. That said, this is also tricky to do in a reliable way.</p>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; "> </p>
</blockquote>
Could ogr expose oldId -> newId information which the
qgsogrprovider would then emit as a signal when the layer is
repacked? I don't mean a persistent mapping, but just for the single
repack operation.<br>
<br>
Sandro<br>
</body>
</html>