<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Hi Andreas,<br>
<br>
We didn't yet find shadow layers in QGIS 3, but I don't think it has
been fixed because it's a silent issue for desktop users.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
René-Luc<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 12/06/2019 à 11:01, Andreas Neumann
a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:d0a40a620041d680f220dc13cbe5f400@carto.net">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p>Hi René-Luc,</p>
<p>Thanks for the reply. Good to know that we are not the only
ones struggling with such issues.</p>
<p>Is this known issue in QGIS 2.x only or also in QGIS 3.x?</p>
<p>I will also have a look at the Layer Board plugin and see what
it does and how it could help us.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Andreas</p>
<p id="reply-intro">On 2019-06-12 10:02, René-Luc Dhont wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left:
#1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0"><!-- html ignored -->
<!-- head ignored -->
<!-- meta ignored --> Hi Andreas,<br>
<br>
It's a known issue. It is not easy to understand because it's
due to SHADOW layers...<br>
Some times, QGIS keeps some undisplayed layers with the same
UUID and stored it in the QGIS project.<br>
<br>
You can use Layer Board plugin to remove them.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
René-Luc<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 11/06/2019 à 18:28, Andreas
Neumann a écrit :</div>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left:
#1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0"><!-- meta ignored -->
<p>Hi all,</p>
<p>At my new work place we are running a 2.x QGIS server
which in two projects behaves very strange: sometimes colors
display in the color we expected, sometimes really light.
Then my colleagues discovered that more than rules share the
same UUID identifier, because the QGS files have been copy
pasted into a anew project and then aggregated again into
the same single project.</p>
<p>Not knowing about the internals of QGIS server 2x (and 3x)
I wonder if this something we need to avoid? Are the UUID
identifiers of a symbology rule relevant and absolutely need
to be unique? Do we have to avoid such id clashes?</p>
<p>The "human readable" nature of qgs/qml files naturally
seduce people to copy / paste and mix project stuff together
in text editors ...</p>
<p>Thank you for your feedback on this topic.</p>
<p>Andreas</p>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org</a>
List info: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a>
Unsubscribe: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<!-- html ignored --><br>
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family:
monospace">_______________________________________________<br>
QGIS-Developer mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org"
rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
List info: <a
href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a
href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer</a></div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>