[Qgis-psc] Fwd: Re: [Qgis-developer] New website

Gary Sherman gsherman at geoapt.com
Wed Feb 20 13:44:03 PST 2013


Same here. +1 to evolve the logo. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 20, 2013, at 12:34, Tim Sutton <tim at linfiniti.com> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> +1 for evolution
> 
> Regards
> 
> Tim
> 
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Robert Szczepanek <robert at szczepanek.pl> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I agree with Otto.
>> I can imagine new logo without or with modified arrow, but can not without some "Q" element.
>> 
>> +1 for evolution of logo
>> 
>> regards,
>> Robert
>> 
>> 
>> On 20.02.2013 09:45, Otto Dassau wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> proceeding is good and I would vote for a contest and I would prefere a
>>> evolution rather than sth totally new.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> Otto
>>> 
>>> Am Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:39:44 +0100
>>> schrieb Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>:
>>> 
>>>> Hi PSC.
>>>> IMHO better have a brand new logo for the new website, so a contest or a
>>>> bid would be more appropriate: what are your feeling? Can we proceed in
>>>> one direction? All the best.
>>>> 
>>>> -------- Messaggio originale --------
>>>> Oggetto: Re: [Qgis-developer] New website
>>>> Data: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:28:19 +0000
>>>> Mittente: Alister Hood <Alister.Hood at synergine.com>
>>>> A: qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org <qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> 
>>>>> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:02:49 +0100
>>>>> From: Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
>>>>> To: qgis-developer at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Qgis-developer] New website
>>>>> Message-ID: <51234DC9.5070802 at faunalia.it>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>>>> 
>>>>> Il 19/02/2013 10:28, Vincent Picavet ha scritto:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Le mardi 19 f?vrier 2013 09:52:17, vinayan a ?crit :
>>>>>>> +1 the logo definitely needs a redesign..
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   +1 too.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think we mostly agree with that, the issue is which route to take to
>>>>> find a better one: contest or bid?
>>>> 
>>>> Another option could be to just use one of the existing proposals.
>>>> I don't think there were any negative comments when the one at
>>>> http://hub.qgis.org/issues/6688 was proposed.
>>>> It would be your "cleanup and revamp", rather than "a brand new one".
>>>> 
>>>> Alister
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qgis-psc mailing list
>> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release  Manager)
> ==============================================
> Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about:
>  * QGIS programming services
>  * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans
>  * FOSS Consulting Services
> Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
> ==============================================
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20130220/e705482d/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list