[Qgis-psc] GH move

Nathan Woodrow madmanwoo at gmail.com
Mon Jun 4 17:26:17 PDT 2018


Hey,

IMO that would be a silly move for no added benefit and a lot of pain.  MS
now is not the MS of old, they are not the open source haters of the
Ballmer years like they used to be.  I strongly suggest we stay where we
are and not react like that for this.   I trust MS over most companies that
could have bought it (if it was Oracle you would have had my support) and I
suspect it will lead to a lot of good things in the future.

I am ok to move to other platforms in future if we need but jumping ship
just because MS now own it is not a good reason to move.

- Nathan

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
wrote:

> Hi all.
> Just read about ms buying GH. Maybe we should react reasonably fast?
> I'd be in favour of migrating to gitlab, preferably on our server.
> Opinions?
> Cheers.
> --
> Sorry for being short
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> Qgis-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20180605/77efca08/attachment.html>


More information about the Qgis-psc mailing list