[Qgis-psc] Environmental policy

[Anita Graser]

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 9:37 AM Paolo Cavallini <cavallini at faunalia.it>
wrote:

> OK, so if everyone in the PSC agrees we can proceed as outlined, and
> announce publicly. One warning however: most voters in AGM do not
> participate in HF, so I'm not 100% sure it is fair to let them decide
> about an extra burden on the participants.
>

+1 for letting the AGM decide.

However, I think the option "yes, reimbursement will be allowed only for
trains and other low impact means" needs a qualifier for people from other
continents than the hackfest location. Otherwise, we basically ban them and
I don't think that's our intention.

Regards,
Anita
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20200128/faff7202/attachment.html>