[Qgis-psc] Advertising Raster FileGeodatabase GDAL work via news feed?

Régis Haubourg regis.haubourg at gmail.com
Wed Dec 21 09:38:56 PST 2022


And +1 for me too!

Thanks a lot Nyall

On 20/12/2022 20:16, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
> also from my side a +1,
> i think it would also be important to mention what Andreas said, add a 
> small paragraph about "lobbying" for open formats/Standards.
>
> thanks for all your work Nyall!
>
> Marco Bernasocchi
>
> QGIS.org Chair
> OSGeo.org Board member
> OPENGIS.ch CEO
>
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2022, 19:41 Anita Graser, <anitagraser at gmx.at> wrote:
>
>     +1 thank you for the proposal, Nyall.
>
>     Regards,
>     Anita
>
>
>     On Tuesday, 20. December 2022 01:10:47 (+01:00), Nyall Dawson wrote:
>
>
>     > Hi PSC.
>
>     >
>
>     > I'm seeking thoughts on whether the news feed can be used to
>     promote a
>
>     > funding opportunity for developing an open driver for accessing
>     raster
>
>     > data stored in ESRI Geodatabases.
>
>     >
>
>     > This is spurred by the recent discussion on the QGIS user list:
>
>     >
>     https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/2022-December/052260.html,
>
>     > but has been an big pain point for a long time. These rasters are
>
>     > currently completely unreadable in QGIS, which presents a big
>     risk for
>
>     > our users when situations arise (like in the linked thread)
>     where data
>
>     > custodians are ONLY publishing official data in these formats.
>
>     >
>
>     > I've had many emails from users who have hit the same situation, and
>
>     > found it be a barrier to using open source software as a result.
>
>     >
>
>     > Unfortunately to date Even, myself, and a number of other motivated
>
>     > users have been unable to find a sponsor for development of the
>
>     > required GDAL driver. As a result I would like to advertise this
>
>     > opportunity via the news feed in the hopes that the wider exposure
>
>     > would lead us to a sponsor, and ultimately to be able to solve this
>
>     > data restriction once and for all...
>
>     >
>
>     > Is this acceptable? I can write (and post) the article if approved.
>
>     >
>
>     > Nyall
>
>     > _______________________________________________
>
>     > QGIS-PSC mailing list
>
>     > QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
>
>     > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>     >
>
>     --
>     Anita Graser
>     Home: http://anitagraser.com
>     Twitter: @underdarkgis
>     Mastodon: @underdarkgis at fosstodon.org
>     _______________________________________________
>     QGIS-PSC mailing list
>     QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
>     https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-PSC mailing list
> QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20221221/dbc848f2/attachment.htm>


More information about the QGIS-PSC mailing list