[Qgis-psc] Call for reviews of grant programme voting results

[Régis Haubourg]

Hi Anita,

thanks a lot for this work.

I double checked and all results look good to me.

Cheers

Régis

On 15/06/2023 19:22, Anita Graser via QGIS-PSC wrote:
>
> Dear fellow PSC members,
>
>
> The voting for the 2023 grant programme has closed and I have 
> calculated the results.
>
>
> As specified in the process description, the computations should be 
> reviewed and confirmed by at least two PSC members. Therefore, I'd 
> like to invite you to have a look.
>
>
> For your convenience, here's the summary of the process:
>
>
> The successful proposals are determined as follows: The calculation of 
> votes is done by summing up the votes for each proposal. We then rank 
> each proposal according to the number of votes it has received.
>
>
> Grants will be allocated by working sequentially from top scoring 
> proposal to lowest until all the funds have been allocated. If the top 
> candidates do not exactly coincide with the total grant budget, we 
> may, depending on available funds, ‘top up’ the grant budget to 
> include the next-in-line proposal and use up all of the available 
> funds. The Google Drive GrantProgramme folder contains spreadsheets 
> with the corresponding formulas.
>
>
> The computed results should be reviewed and confirmed by at least two 
> PSC members before publishing the results.
>
>
> Regards,
> Anita
>
>
> -- 
> Anita Graser
> Home: http://anitagraser.com
> Twitter: @underdarkgis
> Mastodon: @underdarkgis at fosstodon.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-PSC mailing list
> QGIS-PSC at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-psc/attachments/20230618/0bb65949/attachment.htm>