Paolo, Tim, Richard, Jurgen,<div><br></div><div>Can we please get you votes on this?</div><div><br></div><div>- Nathan<br><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun Jan 11 2015 at 18:50:45 Nathan Woodrow <<a href="mailto:madmanwoo@gmail.com">madmanwoo@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">Can the rest of the PSC please vote on this QEP please.<br>
</p>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, 11 Jan 2015 6:21 pm Marco Hugentobler <<a href="mailto:marco.hugentobler@sourcepole.ch" target="_blank">marco.hugentobler@sourcepole.ch</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div>Hi Martin</div></div><div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><br>
<br>
<div>>No I have not tried it yet. Matthias and Richard had
valid points and I will consider them in the >implementation.
The comments should not need any significant changes to the QEP
and I am happy >to update the QEP once a final solution for
handling of big layers has been chosen.</div>
<div><br>
</div></div></div><div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>
Great.<br>
+1 from me to the QEP.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Marco<br>
<br>
Am 10.01.2015 um 08:52 schrieb Martin Dobias:<br>
</div></div><div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hi Marco<br>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Marco
Hugentobler <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marco.hugentobler@sourcepole.ch" target="_blank">marco.hugentobler@sourcepole.<u></u>ch</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div>Hi Martin<br>
<br>
Did you consider the comment from Mathias about
storing the whole layer in memory already? Your answer
was:<br>
<br>
>though it should be fairly easy to use spatial
index library's disk storage instead of memory storage
for big layers.<br>
<br>
So it was not clear for me if you already tried the
disk storage from spatial index library and what the
outcome was.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>No I have not tried it yet. Matthias and Richard had
valid points and I will consider them in the
implementation. The comments should not need any
significant changes to the QEP and I am happy to update
the QEP once a final solution for handling of big layers
has been chosen.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards</div>
<div>Martin</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</div><div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><pre cols="72">--
Dr. Marco Hugentobler
Sourcepole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
<a href="mailto:marco.hugentobler@sourcepole.ch" target="_blank">marco.hugentobler@sourcepole.<u></u>ch</a> <a href="http://www.sourcepole.ch" target="_blank">http://www.sourcepole.ch</a>
Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee</pre>
</div><div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"></div>
______________________________<u></u><u></u>_________________<br>
Qgis-psc mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/<u></u>mailman<u></u>/listinfo/qgis-psc</a></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></div></div>