<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:05 PM, ElPaso <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:elpaso@itopen.it" target="_blank">elpaso@itopen.it</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">Il 23/11/2015 18:09, Anita Graser ha scritto:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5">
I think we also need to make a decision. Therefore, I'd like to suggest to make a motion on Statement 2 and set everything in motion to get minimal bug fixes ready for the next release.<br>
Procedure-wise, I'm wondering who should vote on the motion: core devs? PSC?<br></div></div></blockquote>
thanks for the summary.<br>
I just wonder if discussing on qgis-developer wouldn't be useful.<br>
I'm not sure about ho many developers follow this list, maybe other devs have something interesting to say.</blockquote><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">For the long-term plan, I think this should definitely be discussed on the dev list. For the next release, I'd rather start moving than spend much more time discussing. Just my 2 cents.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Best wishes,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Anita</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"></div><br></div></div></div></div>