<div dir="ltr"><p dir="ltr"><br>
On 24 Nov 2015 6:52 AM, "Luigi Pirelli" <<a href="mailto:luipir@gmail.com" target="_blank">luipir@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 23 November 2015 at 18:09, Anita Graser <<a href="mailto:anitagraser@gmx.at" target="_blank">anitagraser@gmx.at</a>> wrote:<br>
> > Procedure-wise, I'm wondering who should vote on the motion: core devs? PSC?<br>
><br>
> IMHO core+psc<br>
><br>
> reasons:<br>
> 1)everyone is responsible of the code<br>
> 2)how to do public this responsibility is a political choice<br></p>
<p dir="ltr">Isn't this what QEPs are for? I think one should be created for wider discussion of these issues. If we're lucky, the increased exposure to the discussion may result in someone offering up sponsorship to resolve this situation.</p><p>Nyall</p>
<p dir="ltr">><br>
> my 2c<br>
><br>
> Luigi Pirelli<br>
><br>
> **************************************************************************************************<br>
> * Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com<br>
> * LinkedIn: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli" target="_blank">https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli</a><br>
> * Stackexchange: <a href="http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli" target="_blank">http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli</a><br>
> * GitHub: <a href="https://github.com/luipir" target="_blank">https://github.com/luipir</a><br>
> * Mastering QGIS:<br>
> <a href="https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/mastering-qgis" target="_blank">https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/mastering-qgis</a><br>
> **************************************************************************************************<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Qgis-psc mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a></p>
</div>