<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Hi<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On 10 Feb 2016, at 09:53, Sandro Santilli <<a href="mailto:strk@keybit.net" class="">strk@keybit.net</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:42:31AM +1100, Nyall Dawson wrote:<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">I'd also rather see features/fixes accidentally missing from 2.x then<br class="">missing from the 3.0 branch. For this reason I'd prefer that including work<br class="">in 2.x branch be an intentional choice, rather then the default.<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">FWIW, I agree about "master" targetting QGIS 3 and a stable branch<br class="">used for 2.x.<br class=""></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Lets defer the decision to Jürgen, as release manager (and the guy at the coal face of building lots of packages) the call should be his.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Regards</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Tim</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="">--strk;<br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Qgis-psc mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" class="">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br class="">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><div class=""><span><img height="60" width="60" apple-inline="yes" id="7DF813F9-AFA8-4945-B9BC-D31C7201701A" apple-width="yes" apple-height="yes" src="cid:DDEF9B12-67C3-4498-BD7D-EC3563CC35A4" class=""></span><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">Tim Sutton<br class="">QGIS Project Steering Committee Member<br class=""><a href="mailto:tim@qgis.org" class="">tim@qgis.org</a><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""></div><br class=""></div></body></html>