<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Hi Paolo<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">A couple of questions and thoughts:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">1) Will integrations like travis work with GL?</div><div class="">2) Are you proposing to use their hosted service, or a self hosted copy of the community edition?</div><div class="">3) There are most likely many 3rd party services, tools etc. that now rely on the QGIS repo being at <a href="http://github.com/qgis/QGIS" class="">http://github.com/qgis/QGIS</a> - we will break them if we move over to GL</div><div class="">4) The change from CVS to SVN and then from SVN to GIT each introduced a lot of churn. Although moving to a FOSS platform would be nice, its not a clear win for me as we will end up spending a long time dealing with all the side effects of migrating.</div><div class="">5) Personally I am not overly concerned with using GH as a platform - they have done a lot to foster the prolific spread of FOSS even if the platform itself is not free. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">In summary if there was a massive demand for moving to GL I would be ok with it, but I don’t see that - and given all the other moving parts we are going to deal with in the run up to 3.0, one less change is for me better.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Regards</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Tim</div><div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On 16 Mar 2016, at 15:07, Paolo Cavallini <<a href="mailto:cavallini@faunalia.it" class="">cavallini@faunalia.it</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">Il 16/03/2016 14:02, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:<br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">* people have their git folders setup, we don't want to break that<br class="">* devs have their github accounts<br class="">* we are happy with the current workflow<br class="">* we don't need to maintain infrastructure<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">it makes sense, even though it is not a big leap.<br class="">for the last point, I think we can (probably should) use GL<br class="">infrastructure instead of our own, so not much diff here.<br class="">thanks matthias for clarifying, and for pushing this further.<br class="">all the best.<br class="">-- <br class="">Paolo Cavallini - <a href="http://www.faunalia.eu" class="">www.faunalia.eu</a><br class="">QGIS & PostGIS courses: <a href="http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html" class="">http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html</a><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Qgis-psc mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" class="">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br class="">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><div class=""><span><img height="60" width="60" apple-inline="yes" id="AF977503-E89D-4E68-8C45-A921B1853D50" apple-width="yes" apple-height="yes" src="cid:DDEF9B12-67C3-4498-BD7D-EC3563CC35A4" class=""></span><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">Tim Sutton<br class="">QGIS Project Steering Committee Member<br class=""><a href="mailto:tim@qgis.org" class="">tim@qgis.org</a><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""></div><br class=""></div></body></html>