<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Hi<div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On 31 Mar 2016, at 16:37, ElPaso <<a href="mailto:elpaso@itopen.it" class="">elpaso@itopen.it</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">Il 29/03/2016 21:41, Nyall Dawson ha scritto:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class=""><br class="">On 29 Mar 2016 9:08 PM, "Sandro Santilli" <<a href="mailto:strk@keybit.net" class="">strk@keybit.net</a> <<a href="mailto:strk@keybit.net" class="">mailto:strk@keybit.net</a>>> wrote:<br class="">><br class="">> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 03:14:57PM +0100, Giovanni Manghi wrote:<br class="">><br class="">> > What will change? What actions will need to be taken?<br class="">> ><br class="">> > * new issues/feature requests tickets will need to be opened in the<br class="">> > new QGIS bug tracker on GitHub (URL HERE)<br class="">><br class="">> It might be useful to point out that this means that those who<br class="">> are willing to report bugs would also need <a href="http://agithub.com" class="">agithub.com</a> <<a href="http://github.com" class="">http://github.com</a>><br class="">> account (ie: the OSGeo userid would not be enough anymore).<br class=""><br class="">I personally see this as an argument in favour of moving to github issues. I think the current process of requiring users to register for an *osgeo site* account to file a bug on the *QGIS site* is confusing for many users. I suspect we lose a lot of reports just because this convoluted sign up/login process makes it too much work for many.<br class=""><br class="">But over at github registration is much more modern, streamlined and user friendly. And it's much easier to understand that you need a *github* account to post on *github*.<br class=""><br class="">Nyall<br class=""><br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><br class="">The historical reason for LDAP osgeo account was to have a SSO for all our services, that were hosted on osgeo servers, if I remember correctly, the same osgeo account granted access to the plugin website, the main website, the wiki, the bug tracking system and before we moved to github to SVN repository.<br class=""><br class="">Just note that the plugins website will still require an osgeo account, unless we find a way to authenticate users against github.<br class=""></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Its pretty easy to do with django-social-auth plugin.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Regards</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Tim</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="">-- <br class="">Alessandro Pasotti<br class="">w3: <a href="http://www.itopen.it" class="">www.itopen.it</a><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Qgis-psc mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" class="">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br class="">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><div class=""><span>—</span><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><span><img height="118" width="150" apple-inline="yes" id="ED8D9870-996A-4AF3-BE55-4A75D09647D5" apple-width="yes" apple-height="yes" src="cid:1A5DF6DE-E302-4C28-BFBD-29663CBF1351" class=""></span><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">Tim Sutton<br class=""><br class="">Co-founder: Kartoza<br class="">Project chair: <a href="http://qgis.org" class="">QGIS.org</a><br class=""><br class="">Visit http://kartoza.com to find out about open source:<br class=""><br class="">Desktop GIS programming services<br class="">Geospatial web development<br class="">GIS Training<br class="">Consulting Services<br class=""><br class="">Skype: timlinux <br class="">IRC: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">Kartoza is a merger between Linfiniti and Afrispatial<br class=""></div><br class=""></div></body></html>