<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">Hi<div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On 27 Jul 2016, at 2:32 PM, Jeff McKenna <<a href="mailto:jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com" class="">jmckenna@gatewaygeomatics.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""><br class="">Hi all,<br class=""><br class="">I'm assuming here that you are working closely with William, through the QGIS paid 'bug fixing program' (or whatever we name it, for helping to fund the team for each release). </blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I would say we generally don't have too much interaction with William - thats ok for the most part. We would welcome his participation in the paid bug fixing programme.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">I also am assuming that the green button for the release is pressed once packagers on the major platforms are ready, and the documentation team has finished their changes. Yes packagers and documenters must be included on that team, the 'bug fixing program' or whatever you name it.<br class=""></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Here's my take on it (Jürgen as release manager probably has a better way to put this): </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">From our perspective I would say a 'release' only covers the preparation of the source code. Following on that usually comes (in sequence) windows and ubuntu packages, the visual changelog, public announcements, OS X packages, other platform packages. Documentation is only targeted for LTR releases and usually comes out some time after the actual release.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">In an ideal world we would have everything lined up and then make one big splash announcement with everything ready to go, but there are too many ducks to line up in a row :-P</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Regards</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Tim</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="">-jeff<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">On 2016-07-27 4:08 AM, Neumann, Andreas wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Hi all,<br class=""><br class="">I hear a lot of requests for the 2.16 OSX packages - also discussed on<br class="">Twitter. I don't know Kyngchaos and I don't want to push him, because I<br class="">don't know him personally - who is in contact with him? Are there<br class="">technical issues or just a lack of time? Can we do something to<br class="">assist/accelerate the process?<br class=""><br class="">Could we setup an automatic build system for OSX in the future, perhaps<br class="">starting with QGIS 3.x?<br class=""><br class="">The OSX builds seem to be esp. popular in the media and designer community.<br class=""><br class="">Greetings,<br class=""><br class="">Andreas<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""></blockquote>_______________________________________________<br class="">Qgis-psc mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" class="">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br class="">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc<br class=""></blockquote><br class=""><div class=""><span><img height="65" width="59" apple-inline="yes" id="FC795B87-6EAE-4EFF-B2C1-FE45E642BC9A" apple-width="yes" apple-height="yes" src="cid:879A6E78-CA46-47B2-AA0E-1810BD833229" class=""></span><br class=""><br class=""><br class="">---<br class=""><br class="">Tim Sutton<br class="">QGIS Project Steering Committee Chair<br class=""><a href="mailto:tim@qgis.org" class="">tim@qgis.org</a><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><br class=""></div><br class=""></div></body></html>