<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div>Hi Giovanni,<br><br></div>Sorry if it looks like it
was against you. That was not my intention, in any case. We have already
chatted about that and I was counting you as a writer.<br></div>My main
concern is that we have less active contributors (Doc team has never
been big afaik, that said). Current needs are on reviewing big changes
and having partly done that alone for some weeks, it's not a pleasant
activity, sometimes demotivating (but maybe this is my way of "working"
that doesn't correspond to the current situation). Hence, my idea was to
have some more people (still good to have new blood) with you to start
the process and have more hands to fix the numerous issues that are
already listed.<br><br></div>Regards,<br></div>Harrissou<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2018-02-02 14:22 GMT+01:00 Andreas Neumann <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:a.neumann@carto.net" target="_blank">a.neumann@carto.net</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi all,<br>
<br>
Yes Giovanni - we still count on you! It would be good if you could dedicate time to the documentation.<br>
<br>
Greetings,<br>
<br>
Andreas<div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On <a href="tel:02.02.2018%2014" value="+33202201814" target="_blank">02.02.2018 14</a>:00, Giovanni Manghi wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5">
Hi Harrissou,<br>
<br>
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:49 PM, DelazJ <<a href="mailto:delazj@gmail.com" target="_blank">delazj@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi PSC,<br>
<br>
This is a follow-up to the silence that answers my (in doc repo) and<br>
Matteo's recent call for reviewers [0] for the Processing docs he's been<br>
writing for some months now, and more generally for the docs.<br>
While we are all eager and happy to show what we've done with QGIS 3.0, i'm<br>
less proud of the documentation state. There's a lot to do but I wouldn't<br>
want to expand here on the subject; i have already made it repeatedly, here<br>
and there and when required, PSC has tried things. But give a look to the<br>
recent activity in the docs repo and you'll maybe get what I mean.<br>
<br>
Anyway, this mail is just to ask the PSC to please put on the monday meeting<br>
agenda discussion of an allocation (if i'm not wrong, QGIS Docs has some<br>
budget) for paid writers and reviewers for QGIS 3.0 (good after the bug<br>
fix!). Maybe that will attract other people who in turn will take on this<br>
task for a while.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I guess this also regards me as I have accepted the task to start<br>
writing docs not long ago. As already commented with a few of you, it<br>
has been a rough patch lately for me. I was counting to start the task<br>
sooner but I have been delayed mainly for such personal reasons. If<br>
the deal is still on I was counting start (for real this time) by<br>
Monday (and continue trough the dev meeting and beyond).<br>
<br>
with regards<br>
<br>
-- GM --<br></div></div><span class="">
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Qgis-psc mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/qgis-psc</a><br>
</span></blockquote><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Qgis-psc mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/qgis-psc</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>