<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">I think it couldn't have said better.<br>
Thanks Andreas.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Il 14 febbraio 2018 21:29:41 CET, Andreas Neumann <a.neumann@carto.net> ha scritto:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<p>Hi Denis,</p>
<p>The voting was controversial. I know that more people voted for
the Github solution - strictly spoken this would mean that you
could go ahead with migration to github. But the fact that so many
people felt uncomfortable with moving to github - esp. in the
light that it hasn't been shown by a test migration that issue
tracking in github is really feasibly for that many tickets - I
think that we shouldn't move to github yet.</p>
<p>Personally, I don't understand the rush anyway. Shouldn't we
concentrate on the work around releasing QGIS 3 first and then
when there are more resources available - first do a test
migration and see if it is feasible to:<br>
</p>
<p>a) keep the history</p>
<p>b) show that tagging as the only way for structuring tickets is
really feasible</p>
<p>Then we can still decide if we want to move to github or not. And
finally, there are concerns that github is not a "free" platform.
Neither Open Source not it was proven that tickets could be
exported from Github properly, if we'd have to.<br>
</p>
<p>Please also note that both Richard and Jürgen invested quite a
bit of time to upgrade Redmine and move to its own separate
virtual machine. The current Redmine works both fast and stable
and most people did not complain that it is hard to use. So not
really a reason to rush away from Redmine.</p>
<p>Greetings,</p>
<p>Andreas<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 14.02.2018 18:48, Denis Rouzaud
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CAMtsY+ZxHQ8gt2f8PXKjj1cMsHfnCUTfg5NB7i3yc=jp1G7Tog@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">Dear PSC,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>On the minutes of last PSC meeting, a "proposition to
respond" was accepted, but if I'm correct there were no
resonse yet.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Shall we take what is written in the minutes as the
decision? Or shall we wait for a communication from your side
?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks for letting us know as the accepted decision from
the vote was to move to github before the release of 3.0...</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div>Denis</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Qgis-psc mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sorry for being short</body></html>