<div dir="ltr">Remember also moving to another platform leaves some of the community behind, so anything like this is a long term plan with migration not just a quick over night becacuse GitHub changed ownership.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Nyall Dawson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nyall.dawson@gmail.com" target="_blank">nyall.dawson@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 5 June 2018 at 10:49, Denis Rouzaud <<a href="mailto:denis.rouzaud@gmail.com">denis.rouzaud@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi all,<br>
><br>
> Just to bring a bit more context to our project...<br>
><br>
> Decision has been taken during Madeira HF to move to Gitlab.<br>
<br>
</span>I realise that, and am happy to go along with this group decision<br>
*when it's all proven possible and is ready to go*. But the ownership<br>
of GitHub should have no bearing whatsoever on this discussion. We<br>
move when (and if) we can without any regressions, and not on an<br>
accelerated timeline because of this news.<br>
<span class=""><br>
> Original reason was the move of the tbug tracker from Redmine to Github.<br>
> Many raised their voices for Gitlab and decision was taken to see if it is<br>
> feasible and reasonnable to move everything at once to Gitlab (code,<br>
> tracker, CI).<br>
> Vincent proposed to establish a wiki page for listing all the issues<br>
> <a href="https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/wiki/QGIS-Platform-migration-plan" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/<wbr>wiki/QGIS-Platform-migration-<wbr>plan</a><br>
> There is a proposal in the grant program for doing the migration, but it is<br>
> not really clear to me if this also integrate the CI (or only the code/bug<br>
> tracker) part which might be very tedious.<br>
<br>
</span>(My understanding is that the proposal is for prototyping this change<br>
-- not implementing the actual change itself. Oslandia staff can<br>
clarify here.)<br>
<br>
But I agree... porting the CI would be a HUGE effort. It's thanks<br>
mostly to your and Matthias' tireless efforts that we have the<br>
mostly-great CI setup we have today. I can't even begin to estimate<br>
the number of volunteer weeks of development you both have sunk into<br>
this, but my continued, wholehearted thanks are extended to you both<br>
because of it!<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Nyall<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
><br>
> I don't think today's news is affecting our situation, despite our personnal<br>
> relation with MS ;)<br>
><br>
> Best wishes,<br>
> Denis<br>
><br>
> Le lun. 4 juin 2018 à 20:26, Nathan Woodrow <<a href="mailto:madmanwoo@gmail.com">madmanwoo@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br>
>><br>
>> Hey,<br>
>><br>
>> IMO that would be a silly move for no added benefit and a lot of pain. MS<br>
>> now is not the MS of old, they are not the open source haters of the Ballmer<br>
>> years like they used to be. I strongly suggest we stay where we are and not<br>
>> react like that for this. I trust MS over most companies that could have<br>
>> bought it (if it was Oracle you would have had my support) and I suspect it<br>
>> will lead to a lot of good things in the future.<br>
>><br>
>> I am ok to move to other platforms in future if we need but jumping ship<br>
>> just because MS now own it is not a good reason to move.<br>
>><br>
>> - Nathan<br>
>><br>
>> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Paolo Cavallini <<a href="mailto:cavallini@faunalia.it">cavallini@faunalia.it</a>><br>
>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> Hi all.<br>
>>> Just read about ms buying GH. Maybe we should react reasonably fast?<br>
>>> I'd be in favour of migrating to gitlab, preferably on our server.<br>
>>> Opinions?<br>
>>> Cheers.<br>
>>> --<br>
>>> Sorry for being short<br>
>>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
>>> Qgis-psc mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
>> Qgis-psc mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> Qgis-psc mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>