<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Hi Nyall,</div></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Thank you for your feedback on the grant proposal process!</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">On Sun, 17 Jun 2018 at 03:38, Nyall Dawson <<a href="mailto:nyall.dawson@gmail.com" target="_blank">nyall.dawson@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">1. Create a new github repo for submission of the grant proposals -<br></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">The main difference to the current approach would be that submissions are immediately visible instead of them being secret until after the submission period has ended. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">While I don't think that people would be stealing other's ideas, that might cause some issues. </div></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">On the other hand, a general feedback round after the submissions and before the voting could be useful. </div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
2. Require that code-related proposals be accompanied by a QEP filed<br>
at least xx days in advance of the grant application. </blockquote></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Yes, it's a good sign that many proposals this year already included a QEP and I think that voting members also considered the existence of a QEP when ranking the submissions. </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">What amount of days would you consider sufficient for discussing the QEP? If we introduce a general feedback period for all submissions, could we relax the requirement and just use that time window instead of having another deadline for QEPs to manage? </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Regards,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Anita</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"></div><br></div></div></div>