<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Hi, <br>
    </p>
    <p>Thanks Paolo for sharing those thoughts, I think you are
      perfectly right to raise this topic and we indeed are in a moment
      where this needs to be discussed. <br>
    </p>
    <p>I share your view that most of us are now in commercial companies
      offering services around QGIS ecosystem, and probably it is true
      that in some cases, this leads to having less time to contribute
      back sometimes. <br>
    </p>
    <p>I'll share the situation here in France from my point of view. Up
      to now, very very few customers have been funding QGIS
      contribution. I can tell, because I was one of the very few
      funders (maximum 4 persons probably). Two of us quit, and we fail
      into that situation where France probably as higher user /
      population ratio in the world, which makes me somewhat revolt and
      puzzled. I even see customers OK with using open source, but
      refusing "to pay for the others" (yes). Users are expecting a lot
      (macOs packages, reliability, documentation, etc..) but giving
      almost nothing lead to this very moment. <br>
    </p>
    <p>So in my understanding of the situation, our main challenge is to
      structure a power-user/funder/influencer ecosystem that rely on
      much more numerous people. This will generate economic activity
      and progressively lead us to a situation close to PostgreSQL
      ecosystem. I'm very confident that the QGIS involved companies can
      work in a friendly environment and respect each other in that
      scenario.  At Oslandia, we are working closely with Dalibo - a
      postgreSQL expert company- and they get m any users coming from
      the geospatial world. QGIS lead to postGIS, postGIS to
      postgreSQL... They manage contributed back money to PostGIS work
      this year. So +1 with Andreas, let's get closer with our elephant
      friend. <br>
    </p>
    <p>What differs in our economic model, is that Databases are the
      foundations of an information system. Companies accept to pay for
      support contract because they can't afford to be left alone. The
      more criticity, the more money they are ready to give. How do we
      get to a similar criticity situation for QGIS desktop? I think
      QGIS server is one way to go here, it is the reason why big
      companies get into serious and critical apps with QGIS.  <br>
    </p>
    <p>I must also point out that this is not only a QGIS situation, the
      whole OSGeo ecosystem is sharing this. My conclusion for the
      French situation is that we need to work upstream, so I got
      involved into the French Local Chapter of Osgeo, which hosts the
      QGIS user group, and our roadmap follows the path open by Andreas
      and the swiss user group. We need to switch from a benevolent base
      to a professional network there, and help customers know each
      other, share good practices, budgets, emulate, and give prooves of
      seriousness to their hierarchy. That doesn't prevent form taking
      fun however !</p>
    <p>Best regards, and let's keep inclusive, open minded and forward
      thinking as always! This is why I love this community :)<br>
    </p>
    <p>Régis<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 28/03/2019 à 08:36, Andreas Neumann
      a écrit :<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAB2Z92Ar4Nkg-dj=4iFZVVoRdVZwuwHjZ9X0HiJtjYsUckZ9uA@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div dir="ltr">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div dir="ltr"><br>
              </div>
              perpelexed<br>
              <div class="gmail_quote">
                <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at
                  21:01, Anita Graser <<a
                    href="mailto:anitagraser@gmx.at"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">anitagraser@gmx.at</a>>
                  wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px
                  0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                  rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                  <div dir="ltr">
                    <div dir="ltr">
                      <div dir="ltr">
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div dir="ltr">
                            <div style="font-size:small">Thank you for
                              the thoughtful email, Paolo!</div>
                            <div style="font-size:small"><br>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                          <div class="gmail_quote">
                            <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed,
                              Mar 27, 2019 at 7:44 AM Paolo Cavallini
                              <<a href="mailto:cavallini@faunalia.it"
                                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">cavallini@faunalia.it</a>>
                              wrote:</div>
                            <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                              style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                              0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                              rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                              Among these, I see two lines that are to
                              me particularly evident:<br>
                              * the increasing number and importance of
                              proprietary tools <span
                                class="gmail_default"
                                style="font-size:small">...</span> </blockquote>
                            <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                              style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                              0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                              rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                              * the shift from a volunteer-only
                              association<span class="gmail_default"
                                style="font-size:small"> ...</span> </blockquote>
                            <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                              style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                              0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                              rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                              To be very clear, as Chair I do not judge
                              these as problems<span
                                class="gmail_default"
                                style="font-size:small"> ...</span> </blockquote>
                            <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                              style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                              0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                              rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                              We are steadily growing stronger and
                              bigger, and some of these changes<br>
                              might genuinely be unavoidable <span
                                class="gmail_default"
                                style="font-size:small">... </span><br>
                            </blockquote>
                            <div><br>
                            </div>
                            <div>
                              <div style="font-size:small">I don't think
                                we're the only ones in this situation
                                but I'm having a hard time identifying
                                projects with a comparable community
                                structure. </div>
                            </div>
                            <div style="font-size:small"> </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </blockquote>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>It is probably not comparable - but the PostgreSQL
                  community manages to thrive in a shared commercial,
                  but sticking to open source values, community. Most of
                  the work done in PostgreSQL is paid work (probably
                  close to 99%). But the companies involved share their
                  responsibility for the project and work in a friendly
                  environment where they respect each other and
                  collaborate.<br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>EnterpriseDB and 2ndQuadrant, and other smaller
                  companies have offices around the globe, hundreds or
                  thousands of employees and customers (top customers
                  like you can see f.e. at <a
                    href="https://www.enterprisedb.com/about-us"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.enterprisedb.com/about-us</a>
                  or <a
                    href="https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/postgresql/who-uses-postgresql/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/postgresql/who-uses-postgresql/</a>
                  and <a
                    href="https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/case-studies/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.2ndquadrant.com/en/case-studies/</a>
                  )</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Note that I don't talk about Postgis, which is
                  unfortunately, often notoriously underfunded.<br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>I think that the PostgreSQL community could serve
                  as  a future role model for QGIS. Not that I think
                  that we will ever be as big or relevant as PostgreSQL
                  - but perhaps we can learn a bit from them how they
                  manage to balance commercial interests vs. a shared
                  vision of an open project and community.</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>I talked to Bruce Momjian last year (a PostgreSQL
                  evangelist and EnterpriseDB employee). I think he
                  would have some interesting ideas and experiences to
                  share from his decade-long involvement with the
                  PostgreSQL community.</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Should we try to reach out to other successful Open
                  Source projects and perhaps find out how they deal
                  with such problems that arise within our community?<br>
                </div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>Greetings,</div>
                <div>Andreas<br>
                </div>
                <div> </div>
              </div>
              -- <br>
              <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div><br>
                    --<br>
                    Andreas Neumann<br>
                  </div>
                  <a href="http://QGIS.ORG" target="_blank"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">QGIS.ORG</a> board member
                  (treasurer)<br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Qgis-psc mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Open Source GIS Expert / Water management 

mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:regis.haubourg@oslandia.com">regis.haubourg@oslandia.com</a> 
tél: 0033 184 257 870
---------------------------------
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://oslandia.com/">http://oslandia.com/</a>

OSLANDIA IS AN INNOVATIVE COMPANY SPECIALIZED IN GIS ARCHITECTURE. WE
PROVIDE SERVICE ON OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE FOR WHICH WE ARE EDITORS OR
RECOGNIZED EXPERTS.</pre>
  </body>
</html>