<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/15/19 4:53 PM, DelazJ wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAECJsSq8SC+JSPh9Tt8iVDVJvFuLmJJrmaT4pb5d6O-51rpcKA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> (this could be taken
from the commit<br>
description for the upcoming features, and the version
number where it<br>
first appeared can be added)<br>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div><a
href="https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+naughty"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+naughty</a>
represents the issue reports with NO description (because
there was none in the commit). Add to that the issue reports
whose description is only the commit title. Morality:
writers still have to browse qgis/QGIS repository (or wait
for the changelog to have more resources to pick from). So
imho there's a work to do on the devs side to get them used
to descriptive and easily understandable commits or PR.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>This is mostly a limitation of the current system which is
linking mostly commits, not pull requests. This will be much
improved by opengis.ch's grant proposal to automatically open doc
issues from pull requests. Denis should have time to work on that
in the coming weeks.</p>
<p>Hope this clears the dust a bit at least in this area :)</p>
<p>Matthias<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>