<div dir="auto">Hi all,<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I think key people are those that have pronounced in the past in regards to documentation and those that work on it regularly.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">This being said, maybe we can redo the doodle for the next two weeks.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">What is the normal time and week day of psc meetings? That may help.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Thanks,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Alexandre Neto</div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">A terça, 26/11/2019, 16:09, Paolo Cavallini <<a href="mailto:cavallini@faunalia.it">cavallini@faunalia.it</a>> escreveu:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Anita, all<br>
maybe a different schedule will improve participation.<br>
Alexandre, as first proponent, would you like to consult with key people<br>
and propose a different timing?<br>
Cheers.<br>
<br>
Il 26/11/19 16:43, Anita Graser ha scritto:<br>
> Feel free to proceed without me. I'll try to make joining possible if<br>
> it's during office hours but I cannot guarantee that I'll make it.<br>
> <br>
> Regards,<br>
> Anita<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> <br>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 4:29 PM Paolo Cavallini <<a href="mailto:cavallini@faunalia.it" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">cavallini@faunalia.it</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:cavallini@faunalia.it" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">cavallini@faunalia.it</a>>> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> Hi all,<br>
> unfortunately it seems very difficult to have >5 people attending.<br>
> Should we postpone of another week? Would this make participation<br>
> easier?<br>
> Cheers.<br>
> <br>
> Il 25/11/19 13:28, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:<br>
> > I prepared a Doodle, le't find a date:<br>
> > <a href="https://doodle.com/poll/znd5ywwxtcwcmg49" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://doodle.com/poll/znd5ywwxtcwcmg49</a><br>
> > cheers<br>
> ><br>
> > Il 25/11/19 13:19, Tim Sutton ha scritto:<br>
> >> Hi<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >>> On 23 Nov 2019, at 17:14, Alexandre Neto <<a href="mailto:senhor.neto@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">senhor.neto@gmail.com</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:senhor.neto@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">senhor.neto@gmail.com</a>><br>
> >>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:senhor.neto@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">senhor.neto@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:senhor.neto@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">senhor.neto@gmail.com</a>>>><br>
> wrote:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Hi,<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Sorry for the thread hijacking. <br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Regarding the Documentation, as Tim mentioned, video meetings are<br>
> >>> probably much more productive (and clarifying about others opinions)<br>
> >>> than enumerous threads and long messages in the mailing lists. <br>
> >>><br>
> >>> This being said, can I suggest doing a special PSC meeting (or<br>
> >>> something similar) together with the most active or interest members<br>
> >>> of the documentation team, for us to agree on some strategies going<br>
> >>> forward?<br>
> >><br>
> >> +1 from me, great idea!<br>
> >><br>
> >> Regards<br>
> >><br>
> >> Tim<br>
> >><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Thanks,<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Alexandre Neto<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> A sexta, 22/11/2019, 07:00, Tim Sutton <<a href="mailto:tim@kartoza.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">tim@kartoza.com</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:tim@kartoza.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">tim@kartoza.com</a>><br>
> >>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:tim@kartoza.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">tim@kartoza.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:tim@kartoza.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">tim@kartoza.com</a>>>> escreveu:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Hi<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>>> On 21 Nov 2019, at 16:36, Paolo Cavallini<br>
> <<a href="mailto:cavallini@faunalia.it" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">cavallini@faunalia.it</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:cavallini@faunalia.it" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">cavallini@faunalia.it</a>><br>
> >>>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:cavallini@faunalia.it" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">cavallini@faunalia.it</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:cavallini@faunalia.it" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">cavallini@faunalia.it</a>>>> wrote:<br>
> >>>>><br>
> >>>>> Right. If possible and doesn't trigger a lot of followup<br>
> costs.<br>
> >>>>> Sometimes it is better to outsource to a proprietary<br>
> solution, if it<br>
> >>>>> saves us a lot of time and efforts (think about our usage<br>
> of Google<br>
> >>>>> docs, as an example).<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> of course cost is an issue. using and designing infrastructures<br>
> >>>> that are<br>
> >>>> complex, essentially in the hand of a single person,<br>
> difficult or<br>
> >>>> impossible to handle for others, is a major concern to me.<br>
> >>>> the key point here is openness: I think we should avoid<br>
> making the<br>
> >>>> project less open than it could be.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> 8< ———— snip<br>
> >>><br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>>><br>
> >>>>> What do you think about this proposal. Do you still think<br>
> there is a<br>
> >>>>> need to run all of our expenses around our IT infrastructure<br>
> >>>>> through the<br>
> >>>>> voting members?<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> Of course, running costs, once approved, should not be<br>
> discussed<br>
> >>>> every<br>
> >>>> time. I see a number of projects, however, that have been<br>
> financed as<br>
> >>>> special projects, and could be very well have been run<br>
> through a<br>
> >>>> public<br>
> >>>> assessment.<br>
> >>>> again, I'm talking about openness: directing things top<br>
> down may seem<br>
> >>>> more efficient at first, but I believe in the long run it<br>
> is not.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Right but I think you are mischaracterising Andreas’ approach as<br>
> >>> ’not open’. The budget and cost renters would be clear, open and<br>
> >>> agreed with the community, as would the post spending reporting.<br>
> >>> It just means that for certain cases there is not a 3 month lead<br>
> >>> up needed before money could be spent. Denis’ recent request for<br>
> >>> addition support with the python API docs was maybe a good<br>
> example<br>
> >>> of this.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> 8< —————snip —————— <br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>>> * due to connection issues, I've not clear what the outcome<br>
> >>>>> of the<br>
> >>>>> Documentation discussion was; I made my proposal [0], I<br>
> would<br>
> >>>>> appreciate<br>
> >>>>> further comments on it so we can start working on a clear<br>
> >>>>> solution<br>
> >>>>><br>
> >>>>><br>
> >>>>> Tim presented his platform for training lessons. That's<br>
> was mainly<br>
> >>>>> discussed. Sorry, we haven't discussed or came up with a<br>
> >>>>> solution for<br>
> >>>>> the documentation problem yet.<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> I see this issue keep on attracting little interest. I suggest<br>
> >>>> keeping<br>
> >>>> on discussing about this on the mailing list<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> I think the case is more that the issue is complex and<br>
> perplexing<br>
> >>> as we are trying to serve many different needs. Discussing it on<br>
> >>> the mailing list is fine but honestly this (like many<br>
> discussions<br>
> >>> on the mailing list) is just circular with many thread<br>
> hijackings,<br>
> >>> cross issues etc. it becomes difficult to know where we even are<br>
> >>> in the discussions. For example your proposed approach to<br>
> >>> documentation, Harrisou already responded that he would be<br>
> really<br>
> >>> upset to lose translations, asking for example of a platform<br>
> where<br>
> >>> documentation can allow commenting and user augmentation<br>
> etc. and<br>
> >>> his request went unanswered IIRC. This is an example where it<br>
> >>> would be better to go off in a huddle with Harrisou and other<br>
> >>> interested parties and come up with a proposal which they are<br>
> >>> invested in, then bring it back to the mailing list as a<br>
> proposal<br>
> >>> that already has the buy-in from key role-players.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>>> * we need simple rules for adding news, even though a<br>
> degree of<br>
> >>>>> flexibility is useful; cen we agree on [1]?<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> From your original list:<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> 1. global Contributors Meetings announcements (local ones<br>
> only if geofenced)<br>
> >>> 2. global QGIS Days (local ones only if geofenced)<br>
> >>> 3. requests for sponsorship of specific projects<br>
> >>> 4. crowdfunding announcements<br>
> >>> 5. callouts for testing of upcoming qgis releases<br>
> >>> 6. new release announcements when changelog is published<br>
> (after we get<br>
> >>> rid of the small banner)<br>
> >>> 7. survey announcements.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> I just wonder why we need all these rules? We could also<br>
> just rely<br>
> >>> on common sense, ensuring that anything posted is of broad<br>
> >>> interest, and ask the authors to float anything up to the PSC if<br>
> >>> they are not sure. For me it is similar to the <a href="http://blog.qgis.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">blog.qgis.org</a><br>
> <<a href="http://blog.qgis.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://blog.qgis.org</a>><br>
> >>> <<a href="http://blog.qgis.org/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://blog.qgis.org/</a>> which is the ‘voice of the project’ - we<br>
> >>> never really had any problem with what should and shouldn’t<br>
> go on<br>
> >>> there…..<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>>>><br>
> >>>>><br>
> >>>>> That wasn't discussed. What I suggest: please put it into<br>
> the PSC<br>
> >>>>> meeting document for next meeting. These meeting documents<br>
> are our<br>
> >>>>> central log for our discussions and decisions. Everything else<br>
> >>>>> is lost<br>
> >>>>> quite easily. So if you want a decision on that, please<br>
> suggest<br>
> >>>>> a text<br>
> >>>>> in our next meeting document and formulate it there.<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> IMHO we should decide whatever is possible here in the<br>
> mailing list,<br>
> >>>> leaving PSC meeting for the most complex issues, that require a<br>
> >>>> proper<br>
> >>>> discussion in voice. I think most issues can be solved in<br>
> writing.<br>
> >>>> I remember the good old IRC meetings, very good for many<br>
> >>>> decisions, less<br>
> >>>> so for general discussion.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> I think your memory of IRC meetings is clouded by geek nostalgia<br>
> >>> :-) I have very clear memories of being in meetings and waiting<br>
> >>> for ages for each person to respond because they had basically<br>
> >>> wondered away from the computer / opened another app and<br>
> were not<br>
> >>> focussed on the IRC channel. In a voice meeting you can clearly<br>
> >>> know if the participants are present and engaged. IRC was<br>
> frankly<br>
> >>> awful and is no substitute for a well run voice meeting. Of<br>
> course<br>
> >>> a badly run voice meeting is not much better than a badly<br>
> run IRC<br>
> >>> meeting :-) But in general you can put a lot of nuanced<br>
> >>> information across much more quickly in voice than you can<br>
> typing<br>
> >>> in an IRC channel. There is another thing that I find voice /<br>
> >>> video meetings really good for: Email / IRC discussions can<br>
> often<br>
> >>> sound much more heated than they really are, voice calls carry a<br>
> >>> lot of extra context over in the conversation and we get to hear<br>
> >>> tone and sentiment portrayed much more accurately. Speaking in<br>
> >>> voice reminds us that we are humans, gives us a sense of shared<br>
> >>> endeavour and rapport that simply don’t manifest in the rather<br>
> >>> functional and faceless platform of email / irc. <br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>>> IMHO PSC meetings are lasting too long, and are not a very<br>
> >>>> efficient way<br>
> >>>> of making decisions. Having just one meeting once a month does<br>
> >>>> not help<br>
> >>>> taking timely and efficient decisions.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> I’m fine with discussing things on the mailing list, but<br>
> they are<br>
> >>> really bad places for actual decisions. People call for<br>
> votes too<br>
> >>> quickly, or vote on things when no call has been made, votes<br>
> come<br>
> >>> through in bits in pieces, there is no clarity on who should<br>
> >>> actually be voting, it is difficult to know when votes are<br>
> >>> finished, new threads emerge soon after one finishes where new<br>
> >>> votes are made and it is basically impossible to track any<br>
> >>> decisions. Also in email, people are extremely selective about<br>
> >>> which parts of an email they respond to so many concerns<br>
> often go<br>
> >>> unaddressed. In voice it is much easier to dig and get the<br>
> >>> specific information you need. An example of this is Anita’s<br>
> >>> recent comment in an off list chat about putting out one-liner<br>
> >>> emails with little context leaving the reader to puzzle out what<br>
> >>> is intended - in a conversation you can just ask the person<br>
> >>> ‘please clarify’.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> In terms of our meetings lasting long, yes we should try to<br>
> >>> time-cap meetings, but I also think (as I was alluding to above)<br>
> >>> that there is huge merit in us actually spending time together<br>
> >>> thrashing things out rather than rushing in, rushing out of<br>
> >>> meetings. Ideally our meetings should be run in a way that the<br>
> >>> document agenda contains a list of clear ‘yes/no’<br>
> proposals, with<br>
> >>> an opportunity for the proposer to give some background to the<br>
> >>> proposal in voice and the PSC to ask any questions to inform<br>
> their<br>
> >>> vote, then the execution of a quick vote directly in the google<br>
> >>> doc. All of that can be time capped to e.g. 1 hour. Whatever<br>
> >>> doesn’t get covered gets carried over to the top of the next<br>
> >>> meetings agenda. <br>
> >>><br>
> >>> I really like the chance to hang out before / after the meetings<br>
> >>> to dig into topics a little more. You also get a good sense of<br>
> >>> where people are in their private lives and can use that to<br>
> >>> understand tone in subtext in emails over the subsequent month.<br>
> >>> Frankly some of the exchanges we have on email these days<br>
> worry me<br>
> >>> that people are getting unhappy and that we are losing cohesion.<br>
> >>> Spending time together and getting on the same page about things<br>
> >>> is a good fix for that…I think this is especially important for<br>
> >>> you Paolo - as project chair you should be working hard to<br>
> have a<br>
> >>> deep sense of rapport with the team (first to arrive, last to<br>
> >>> leave) so that you can get the most possible enthusiasm and<br>
> >>> collaboration from everyone in the PSC and in the community,<br>
> and<br>
> >>> set the general direction of how the project is going.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>>> It would be valuable and more efficient if all of our<br>
> >>>>> discussions and<br>
> >>>>> decisions really end up in these meeting documents. Everything<br>
> >>>>> else is<br>
> >>>>> just discussion to me, and not a formal decision.<br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> I think we can vote here for most issues.<br>
> >>>> In short, I propose to put forward all the issues here on<br>
> the ML, and<br>
> >>>> leave to the voice meetings what we were unable to solve during<br>
> >>>> the month.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Ok, again I say that ML is a terrible place to find<br>
> decisions and<br>
> >>> we should use them for discussing things and record the<br>
> decisions<br>
> >>> on something like loomio on a wiki or somewhere discoverable and<br>
> >>> canonical.<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Anyway good discussion folks, rock on QGIS! Lets be human and<br>
> >>> remember that talking to each other is a key part of being a<br>
> good<br>
> >>> team for providing the much needed governance to the QGIS<br>
> project. :-)<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Regards<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Tim<br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>>><br>
> >>>> Cheers.<br>
> >>>> --<br>
> >>>> Paolo Cavallini - <a href="http://www.faunalia.eu" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">www.faunalia.eu</a> <<a href="http://www.faunalia.eu" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.faunalia.eu</a>><br>
> <<a href="http://www.faunalia.eu/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.faunalia.eu/</a>><br>
> >>>> <a href="http://QGIS.ORG" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">QGIS.ORG</a> <<a href="http://QGIS.ORG" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://QGIS.ORG</a>> <<a href="http://qgis.org/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://qgis.org/</a>> Chair:<br>
> >>>> <a href="http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/</a><br>
> >>>> _______________________________________________<br>
> >>>> Qgis-psc mailing list<br>
> >>>> <a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a>>><br>
> >>>> <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> <br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> ---<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> *Tim Sutton*<br>
> >>> <a href="mailto:tim@qgis.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">tim@qgis.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:tim@qgis.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">tim@qgis.org</a>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:tim@qgis.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">tim@qgis.org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:tim@qgis.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">tim@qgis.org</a>>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> _______________________________________________<br>
> >>> Qgis-psc mailing list<br>
> >>> <a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a>>><br>
> >>> <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a><br>
> >>><br>
> >>> <qgis-icon-60x60.png>_______________________________________________<br>
> >>> Qgis-psc mailing list<br>
> >>> <a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a>>><br>
> >>> <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a><br>
> >><br>
> >> —<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >> *Tim Sutton*<br>
> >><br>
> >> *Co-founder:* Kartoza<br>
> >> *Ex Project chair:* QGIS.org <<a href="http://QGIS.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://QGIS.org</a>><br>
> >><br>
> >> Visit <a href="http://kartoza.com" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://kartoza.com</a> <<a href="http://kartoza.com/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://kartoza.com/</a>> to find out about open<br>
> >> source:<br>
> >><br>
> >> Desktop GIS programming services<br>
> >> Geospatial web development<br>
> >> GIS Training<br>
> >> Consulting Services<br>
> >><br>
> >> *Skype*: timlinux <br>
> >> *IRC:* timlinux on #qgis at <a href="http://freenode.net" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">freenode.net</a> <<a href="http://freenode.net" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://freenode.net</a>><br>
> <<a href="http://freenode.net" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://freenode.net</a>><br>
> >><br>
> >> I'd love to connect. Here's my calendar link<br>
> >> <<a href="https://calendly.com/timlinux" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://calendly.com/timlinux</a>> to make finding time easy.<br>
> >><br>
> >><br>
> >> _______________________________________________<br>
> >> Qgis-psc mailing list<br>
> >> <a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br>
> >> <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a><br>
> >><br>
> ><br>
> <br>
> -- <br>
> Paolo Cavallini - <a href="http://www.faunalia.eu" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">www.faunalia.eu</a> <<a href="http://www.faunalia.eu" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.faunalia.eu</a>><br>
> <a href="http://QGIS.ORG" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">QGIS.ORG</a> <<a href="http://QGIS.ORG" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://QGIS.ORG</a>> Chair:<br>
> <a href="http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/</a><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Qgis-psc mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a>><br>
> <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a><br>
> <br>
<br>
-- <br>
Paolo Cavallini - <a href="http://www.faunalia.eu" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">www.faunalia.eu</a><br>
<a href="http://QGIS.ORG" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">QGIS.ORG</a> Chair:<br>
<a href="http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Qgis-psc mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a></blockquote></div></div>