<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi Denis,<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04.06.2020 09:22, Denis Rouzaud
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMtsY+bsh36=Rrc0QxQ1XRoiZz7ffROoKJsK4U2hbHy2ppC5OQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">Hi all,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Many thanks for handling this.</div>
<div>I have remove the labels from the concerned issues on the
QEP repo.</div>
<div><a
href="https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AGrant-2020"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AGrant-2020</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Thank you for taking care of the labels!<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMtsY+bsh36=Rrc0QxQ1XRoiZz7ffROoKJsK4U2hbHy2ppC5OQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>I checked the list and it seems that 2 grants from René-Luc
were not in the evaluated list:</div>
<div><a
href="https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/188"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/188</a><br>
</div>
<div><a
href="https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/187"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/187</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Since no proposals for these two QEPs were submitted through the
submission form, they will not take part in this year's funding
round.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Anita<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMtsY+bsh36=Rrc0QxQ1XRoiZz7ffROoKJsK4U2hbHy2ppC5OQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I am not sure how you want to handle this, so I'll let you
decide before doing anything to the labeld.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Denis</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le mer. 3 juin 2020 à 22:15,
Anita Graser <<a href="mailto:anitagraser@gmx.at"
moz-do-not-send="true">anitagraser@gmx.at</a>> a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Dear
devs and fellow PSC members,<br>
<br>
As part of yesterday's PSC meeting, we reviewed the grant
proposals with<br>
regards to this year's formal grant programme criteria. You
can find the<br>
results of this review in a new tab within the proposal
spreadsheet at:<br>
<br>
<a
href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DICkD-aE7VlPPCrA44NlsHOkwfGO19UrGYHRKB_A648/edit?usp=sharing"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DICkD-aE7VlPPCrA44NlsHOkwfGO19UrGYHRKB_A648/edit?usp=sharing</a><br>
<br>
12 out of 17 proposals meet the grant programme requirements
and are<br>
therefore eligible for funding. Out of these 12, there are two<br>
documentation proposals that the PSC has decided to fund
directly<br>
through the (separate) documentation budget. The remaining 10
proposals<br>
result in a total requested budget of EUR 45,400.<br>
<br>
I'd like to stress that this eligibility check is by no means
a<br>
judgement of the quality of an idea. Therefore, I'd like to
strongly<br>
encourage to follow up on the related QEPs even if a proposal
cannot be<br>
funded by this year's grant programme.<br>
<br>
The QEP discussion deadline for eligible proposals is Tuesday,
June 9.<br>
Afterwards we will move forward to the voting.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Anita<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Qgis-psc mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">Qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a></blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>