<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Thanks everyone for the insights!<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 06.11.2020 09:12, Matthias Kuhn
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAC7zN94d=0ouf0K6ovsdXxont8b=LvVJzUx6U9YjebfJP9eFKw@mail.gmail.com">The
additional work is required even if we roll our own CI instance.
It's 98% work with respect to dependencies which will also be
updated there and is not github workflow specific.<br>
</blockquote>
<p>So if we want to keep our test suite (and don't want to lose
testing capabilities that were funded - in part - by previous
rounds of QGIS grants), we have to invest, don't we?<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAC7zN94d=0ouf0K6ovsdXxont8b=LvVJzUx6U9YjebfJP9eFKw@mail.gmail.com">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 9:05 AM
Richard Duivenvoorde <<a href="mailto:rdmailings@duif.net"
moz-do-not-send="true">rdmailings@duif.net</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On
11/6/20 8:07 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote: <br>
> I don't think any one individual will be able to do this,
and am<br>
> raising the question with PSC of whether <a
href="http://qgis.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">qgis.org</a> is able to fund a<br>
> coordinated sprint effort ...<br>
> My estimate is that we're looking at a total commitment
of roughly<br>
> 10-12 developer days effort here. (Including the
3.10/3.16 backports)<br>
<br>
Playing devil's advocate here: 10-12 days is a reasonable
amount of work money.<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I think this is exactly the kind of work that QGIS.ORG sustaining
members want us to fund. <br>
</p>
<p>Imho, backports for 3.10 may be up for discussion if they are
particularly time consuming.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Anita<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>