<div dir="ltr">That'd be also a big +1 from me to go in a more modern and welcoming way<div>It seems the path should not be too complex: <a href="https://discourse.osgeo.org/c/qgis/11">https://discourse.osgeo.org/c/qgis/11</a></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Denis</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le jeu. 12 mars 2026 à 17:38, Jean Felder via QGIS-PSC <<a href="mailto:qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org">qgis-psc@lists.osgeo.org</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p>Hi everyone,<br>
<br>
Thanks Valentin for raising this discussion.</p>
<p>I also think migrating to Discourse is a good idea. <br>
<br>
I had the chance to experience the migration of the GNOME
project from a mailing list to discourse, and it was a
complete success. In particular: <br>
- It allowed many people who found subscribing to a mailing
list too complicated to join the discussion (please, don’t try
to rationalize this. Yes, for some people, especially
newcomers, subscribing to a mailing list really is difficult)<br>
- It created new discussions between project developers and
users. By users, I mean people who have lots of ideas or
feedback for the project but would never have created a GitHub
account</p>
<p>For more information, here’s some feedback from the GNOME
project:</p>
<p>-
<a href="https://discourse.gnome.org/t/common-questions-re-mailman-to-discourse/11841" target="_blank">https://discourse.gnome.org/t/common-questions-re-mailman-to-discourse/11841</a><br>
- <a href="https://discourse.gnome.org/t/sub-categories/11733/6?u=trim" target="_blank">https://discourse.gnome.org/t/sub-categories/11733/6?u=trim</a></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I also want to point out that it’s totally possible to use
Discourse directly from an email client. That’s one of
Discourse’s strengths. <br>
See for example:<br>
- <a href="https://discourse.gnome.org/t/interacting-with-discourse-via-email/46" target="_blank">https://discourse.gnome.org/t/interacting-with-discourse-via-email/46</a><br>
- <a href="https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/how-do-i-use-discourse-via-email/15279" target="_blank">https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/how-do-i-use-discourse-via-email/15279</a></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Cheers,<br>
Jean</p>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Le 09/03/2026 à 21:17, Valentin Buira
via QGIS-PSC a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hi PSC,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>As per my email subject, I would like to know more about
the status of the migrating mailing list to OSGeo discourse,
as it was announced almost two years ago on this mailing
list [1]</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>mailman is a venerable piece of software that has
served us well for the past 10 years, but the quality of
life improvements everywhere else has made mailman pale in
comparison of what a 2026 collaborative platform could be. I
think it's a good time to study the possibility of migrating
to discourse again. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
In random order a list of defavor argument for mailman and
favor argument for discourse:
<div><br>
</div>
<div>* Answering to an email is super tedious, I don't have a
mail client installed on my computer and I found two
workaround this: </div>
<div> - use the developer tools of my browser to find the
right reply-to email. </div>
<div> - Or write the email first, then browse from my phone
the web interface for the right mail to answer to and
finally click on it as my gmail app acts as a mail client.
</div>
<div>* No search function out of the box we have to rely on
external service like : <a href="http://mail-archive.com" target="_blank">mail-archive.com</a> it's
fine if you have been in the project for 10 years but if you
join recently there is a loss of informations. </div>
<div>* Sometimes I want to answer a really old topic, but I
don't because I don't want to pollute everybody else
mailbox. Discourse handles long-tail discussions more
cleanly via threading</div>
<div>* This one is a bit subjective BUT to me the current web
interface looks like a scam website</div>
<div>* Emojis support in discourse (I think they light up the
mood sometimes ) </div>
<div>* Blender, Gnome, Mozilla, pg-routing have all adopted
it, and have not looked back. </div>
<div>* Mobile support in discourse</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Last time the discussion came up, I feel like the
arguments were really one sided, that's why I would like to
open up the discussion again. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I understand the concerns about the migration, and if we
don't want to dive in right away maybe we could have an
experiment period of 6 months? Keep both side by side, give
it a try, and I am convinced the concerns will fade
quickly. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div>Valentin</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>[1] <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2024-April/066662.html" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2024-April/066662.html</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
QGIS-PSC mailing list
<a href="mailto:QGIS-PSC@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">QGIS-PSC@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<pre cols="72">--
Jean Felder
Développeur SIG
Oslandia</pre>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
QGIS-PSC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:QGIS-PSC@lists.osgeo.org" target="_blank">QGIS-PSC@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc</a><br>
</blockquote></div>