[Qgis-user] Problem with WMS 1.1.1 data providers in QGIS 2.0.1

[Andrea Peri]

I agree.

Often is not known the kind of wms server so I apply always the
map_resolution and the dpi parameters.


2013/10/22 Andreas Neumann <a.neumann at carto.net>

> Hi all,
>
> I think the dpi parameter is a useful extension and should be added by
> the QGIS client (given that the dpi are really correctly detected).
>
> If a WMS server chokes on additional paramters it is not very well
> designed. They can just ignore these extra parameters if they do not
> know how to deal with it.
>
> Just my opinion.
>
> Andreas
>
> Am 22.10.2013 10:30, schrieb Bernhard Ströbl:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a similar issue with geoserver.
> > QGIS2 request is:
> >
> http://my_internal_server/geoserver/ows?SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.3.0&REQUEST=GetMap&BBOX=my_bbox&CRS=my_crs&WIDTH=242&HEIGHT=278&LAYERS=my_layer&STYLES=&FORMAT=image/png&DPI=96&MAP_RESOLUTION=96&FORMAT_OPTIONS=dpi:96&TRANSPARENT=TRUE
> >
> > entering this URL in the browser results in a geoserver error message.
> > However if I leave out FORMAT_OPTIONS=dpi:96 (which, according to the
> > geoserver docs [1] should be supported) the map image is returned.
> > Two more remarks
> > 1) not all layers fail with this request
> > 2) QGIS 1.8 did not add this dpi-96 stuff, so all my layers worked in 1.8
> >
> > What was the reason to intoduce the dpi96 stuff and could we probably
> > change that to a configurable option (yes/no) of the WMS connection?
> >
> > Bernhard
> >
> > [1] http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wms/vendor.html
> >
> > Am 22.10.2013 10:12, schrieb Miguel Ángel Castro:
> >> Hi Richard,
> >>
> >> I can see what you show to me.
> >>
> >> But, this problem not takes place in QGIS 1.8.0 with this WMS data
> >> source (
> >> http://idecan2.grafcan.es/ServicioWMS/EspNat) and similar others.
> >>
> >> Something in wmsprovider.dll of QGIS 2.0.1?
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance
> >> Miguel Ángel Castro
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> __________ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus
> >> signature database 8948 (20131022) __________
> >>
> >> The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
> >> http://www.eset.com
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________ Information from ESET Mail Security, version of virus
> > signature database 8948 (20131022) __________
> >
> > The message was checked by ESET Mail Security.
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-user mailing list
> > Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>



-- 
-----------------
Andrea Peri
. . . . . . . . .
qwerty àèìòù
-----------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/attachments/20131022/1df14637/attachment.html>