[Qgis-user] [UFC : PUB]Qgis-user Digest, Vol 124, Issue 33

[Andreas Neumann]

Hi,

So it seems like there isn't anything substantial missing from the 64bit 
version and your diff shows that the 64bit version has the newer package 
versions. So it should be the recommended version on Windows, in my opinion.

Andreas

On 20.06.2016 12:17, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 20/06/2016 13:12, Jürgen E. Fischer ha scritto:
>> Hi Paolo,
>>
>> On Mon, 20. Jun 2016 at 12:48:07 +0300, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
>>> AFAIK there are still packages missing form the 64bit version:
>>> http://download.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/versions_diff-x86-x86_64.html
>>> It would be great to align the two, so we could recommend the 64 in most
>>> cases.
>> We don't?  I do.  What's missing?   The list doesn't make a difference
>> between stuff not there and stuff missing (ie. cruft isn't missing).
> OTB used to be my main missing feature, but if I interpret correctly now
> it's also on 64, so OK.
> Are the python libs useful for external plugins also fully aligned?
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user at lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-user/attachments/20160620/6c859396/attachment.html>