<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
</head><body style="">
<div>
Add 'made-with-european-fund.shp' in the name of the shapefile :))
</div>
<div>
<br />> Le 3 juillet 2014 à 16:58, Andrea Peri <aperi2007@gmail.com> a écrit :
<br />>
<br />>
<br />> Yes, I confirm this heavy constraint.
<br />>
<br />> Every develope with european fund ask to have a logo in it.
<br />>
<br />> More complex then this is when with the european fund you do a GIS archive.
<br />>
<br />> The european officers think only to a map as a pdf or as an image so
<br />> they guess seem easy to put a logo on it.
<br />> But if the result of funded work is a shapefile , where I put the logo ?
<br />> :))
<br />>
<br />> A.
<br />>
<br />>
<br />> 2014-07-03 15:37 GMT+02:00 n.rochard@aduga.org <n.rochard@aduga.org>:
<br />> > Ask more for have 50% of the request :-)
<br />> > Its not necessary but carefull if you order a improvment with Europe's fund,
<br />> > you must display the logo (it was our experience with the QGIS plugin
<br />> > "cadastre")
<br />> >
<br />> > Nicolas
<br />> >
<br />> >> Le 3 juillet 2014 à 15:26, Andreas Neumann <a.neumann@carto.net> a écrit :
<br />> >>
<br />> >>
<br />> >> In the visual changelog I wouldn't propose to include logos of funding
<br />> >> organizations. Just the name and the link to the organization.
<br />> >>
<br />> >> Andreas
<br />> >>
<br />> >> Am 03.07.2014 13:18, schrieb Andreas Neumann:
<br />> >> > Hi all,
<br />> >> >
<br />> >> > I think a mention of the organization who funded a feature in the visual
<br />> >> > changelog is a reasonable request. Not much work and a fair recognition
<br />> >> > and "thank you" visible by many.
<br />> >> >
<br />> >> > In the visual changelog you also list the sponsors at the very top - so
<br />> >> > why not also mentioning the funding organization? If there are two or
<br />> >> > three co-funding you can list them all.
<br />> >> >
<br />> >> > I can see a positive effect by this that other organizations may also
<br />> >> > think about funding a specific feature if they see that other
<br />> >> > organizations do the same.
<br />> >> >
<br />> >> > I don't think that many users are aware that more than half of QGIS
<br />> >> > features would not exist if organizations or companies would not fund
<br />> >> > them.
<br />> >> >
<br />> >> > I am with Nicolas and Oslandia on this request and I think that the
<br />> >> > visual changelog is a good place to thank the funders.
<br />> >> >
<br />> >> > Andreas
<br />> >> >
<br />> >> > Am 03.07.2014 12:29, schrieb n.rochard@aduga.org:
<br />> >> >> Sear Paolo
<br />> >> >>
<br />> >> >> I think, social network is a good way, politician are using it a lot.
<br />> >> >> The oher way should put the name and logo of the agency/business wich
<br />> >> >> fund
<br />> >> >> entirely a new feature on the graphic changelog
<br />> >> >> (http://changelog.linfiniti.com/qgis/version/2.4.0/)
<br />> >> >>
<br />> >> >> Thanks for your quick reply
<br />> >> >>
<br />> >> >> Nicolas
<br />> >> >
<br />> >> > _______________________________________________
<br />> >> > Qgis-user mailing list
<br />> >> > Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
<br />> >> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
<br />> >> >
<br />> >>
<br />> >> _______________________________________________
<br />> >> Qgis-user mailing list
<br />> >> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
<br />> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
<br />> >
<br />> > _______________________________________________
<br />> > Qgis-user mailing list
<br />> > Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
<br />> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
<br />>
<br />>
<br />>
<br />> --
<br />> -----------------
<br />> Andrea Peri
<br />> . . . . . . . . .
<br />> qwerty àèìòù
<br />> -----------------
</div>
</body></html>