<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Manoj -<br>
<br>
The best database for a spatial infrastructure in the enterprise
is the database system you presently use in the enterprise ... if
you already have a database system in the enterprise and it
supports spatial data. Otherwise Postgres/Postgis wins hands down.
The - very small - general performance difference between Postgres
and Oracle is easily overcome by investing in better hardware for
PostgreSql using a small part of the money saved by <b>not</b>
buying several very expensive Oracle licenses . And let the
PostgreSql database server instance run on Linux.<br>
<br>
Regards <br>
<br>
Bo Victor Thomsen<br>
AestasGis<br>
Denmark<br>
<br>
Den 31-10-2014 09:26, mojgarg skrev:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:1414743966147-5170544.post@n6.nabble.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hello,
Keeping the license cost of oracle aside, does someone has any view whether
its QGIS is best with postgis or oracle spatial when come to enterprise wide
implementation.
Best Regards
Manoj
--
View this message in context: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-va-Postgis-or-Oracle-Spatial-tp5170544.html">http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-va-Postgis-or-Oracle-Spatial-tp5170544.html</a>
Sent from the Quantum GIS - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>