<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Tyler,</p>
<p>You could have a look at Canada's NRCan Canvec data doc to get
some ideas:</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="ftp://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/pub/canvec/archive/canvec+_archive_20151029/doc/">ftp://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/pub/canvec/archive/canvec+_archive_20151029/doc/</a></p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Best Regards,
Brent Fraser</pre>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/10/2016 5:31 AM, Tyler Veinot
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CANfsH336Z3+A_LHyq-kvXqr41pT7FzBE--QHR02joh4u0205Fg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Ok so not really a QGIS question per say but I
figured someone in this group would have some thoughts.<br>
I found out that neither my employer, region, or province has a
topographic database standards or any type of standardization of
features. I did some google searches to try and fine a generic
topographic database standard I could work from but didn't find
anything as of yet of any real use. I know there is the old LRIS
Feature Codes list from the CARIS days I could probably
commandeer because no one seems to use it any more.
<div>Anyway has anyone developed a topographic standard of
features and feature codes? Any advice and resources you could
direct me to? </div>
<div>Thanks </div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org</a>
List info: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a>
Unsubscribe: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>