<p>Yes, seriously, is there a way???</p>
<p>which QGis version ?</p>
<p>and how to proceed?</p>
<p>That sems impossible, because a lot of mysterious messages like these ones:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>cheers</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Henri (<span class="short_text"><span>desperate Linux user)<br /></span></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p>==================================================================</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Paramétrage de qgis-providers (2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ...<br />/usr/lib/qgis/crssync: error while loading shared libraries: <strong>libgif.so.4</strong>: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory<br />dpkg: erreur de traitement du paquet qgis-providers (--configure) :<br /> le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 127<br />Paramétrage de libjs-leaflet (0.7.3~dfsg-1) ...<br />Paramétrage de qgis-common (2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ...<br />dpkg: des problèmes de dépendances empêchent la configuration de qgis :<br /> qgis dépend de qgis-providers (= 2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ; cependant :<br /> Le paquet qgis-providers n'est pas encore configuré.<br /><br />dpkg: erreur de traitement du paquet qgis (--configure) :<br /> problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré<br />Paramétrage de qgis-plugin-globe-common (2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ...<br />Aucun rapport « apport » n'a été créé car le message d'erreur indique une erreur consécutive à un échec précédent.<br /> dpkg: des problèmes de dépendances empêchent la configuration de qgis-plugin-globe :<br /> qgis-plugin-globe dépend de qgis (= 2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ; cependant :<br /> Le paquet qgis n'est pas encore configuré.<br /><br />dpkg: erreur de traitement du paquet qgis-plugin-globe (--configure) :<br /> problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré<br />Aucun rapport « apport » n'a été créé car le message d'erreur indique une erreur consécutive à un échec précédent.<br /> Paramétrage de qgis-plugin-grass-common (2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ...<br />dpkg: des problèmes de dépendances empêchent la configuration de qgis-provider-grass :<br /> qgis-provider-grass dépend de qgis (= 2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ; cependant :<br /> Le paquet qgis n'est pas encore configuré.<br /><br />dpkg: erreur de traitement du paquet qgis-provider-grass (--configure) :<br /> problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré<br />Aucun rapport « apport » écrit car MaxReports a déjà été atteint<br /> dpkg: des problèmes de dépendances empêchent la configuration de qgis-plugin-grass :<br /> qgis-plugin-grass dépend de qgis (= 2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ; cependant :<br /> Le paquet qgis n'est pas encore configuré.<br /> qgis-plugin-grass dépend de qgis-provider-grass (= 2.14.1+dfsg-3~xenial0) ; cependant :<br /> Le paquet qgis-provider-grass n'est pas encore configuré.<br /><br />dpkg: erreur de traitement du paquet qgis-plugin-grass (--configure) :<br /> problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré<br />Aucun rapport « apport » écrit car MaxReports a déjà été atteint<br /> Traitement des actions différées (« triggers ») pour libc-bin (2.23-0ubuntu3) ...<br />Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution :<br /> qgis-providers<br /> qgis<br /> qgis-plugin-globe<br /> qgis-provider-grass<br /> qgis-plugin-grass<br />E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)<br /><br /></p>
<p>======================================================================</p>
<p>very very bad trip since I've made the upgrade from 14.04 LTS to 16.04 LTS</p>
<p> </p>
<p>La curiosité est un vilain défaut...<span class="short_text"><span>curiosity is a bad thing...</span></span></p>
<p><span class="short_text"><span> </span></span></p>
<blockquote style="padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #ff0000 2px solid;">> Message du 14/09/16 06:24<br />> De : "Blumentrath, Stefan" <Stefan.Blumentrath@nina.no><br />> A : "Randal Hale" <rjhale@northrivergeographic.com>, "qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org" <qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org><br />> Copie à : <br />> Objet : Re: [Qgis-user] Ubuntu updating instructions<br />> <br />><meta /><meta /><!--[if gte mso 9]><noxml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><noxml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">And if I may add:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">Even if the users are aware of the fact that ubuntugis-unstable contains the current releases, it can be hard to impossible to convince a GIS-ignorant system administrator that it is OK to install “unstable” packages.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">But this issue is not a QGIS issue I guess...</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;"> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="border: none; border-top: solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt; padding: 3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm;">
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">From:</span></strong><span style="font-size: 11.0pt;"> Qgis-user [mailto:qgis-user-bounces@lists.osgeo.org] <strong>On Behalf Of </strong>Randal Hale<br />> <strong>Sent:</strong> 13. september 2016 16:45<br />> <strong>To:</strong> qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org<br />> <strong>Subject:</strong> Re: [Qgis-user] Ubuntu updating instructions</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p>> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 09/13/2016 10:23 AM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:</p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top: 5.0pt; margin-bottom: 5.0pt;">
<pre>Hi Randal,</pre>
<pre> </pre>
<pre>On Tue, 13. Sep 2016 at 00:21:21 -0400, Randal Hale wrote:</pre>
<blockquote style="margin-top: 5.0pt; margin-bottom: 5.0pt;">
<pre>It's a little bit confusing. There are like three repositories:</pre>
<pre>stable, unstable, and testing. Testing you don't want (unless you</pre>
<pre>want to test packages). Typically stable is a bit older. Unstable is</pre>
<pre>current. Which doesn't really make sense - but that's the way it is.</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre> </pre>
<pre>Not like it matters much in this case.</pre>
<pre> </pre>
<pre>We have packages in qgis.org/debian/ against the plain versions of the</pre>
<pre>distributions (debian and **ubuntu**) and in qgis/ubuntugis/ packages against</pre>
<pre>newer dependencies from - and only from - ubuntugis-unstable.</pre>
<pre> </pre>
<pre>Looks like it's hard for people to accept that there are also ubuntu packages</pre>
<pre>in a directory called debian and that probably makes them jump on the other</pre>
<pre>because it has ubuntu in it's name.</pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal">I was thinking about it last night (and I was up way to late) and it is a bit confusing for the casual user. They've installed Ubuntu (or mint/debian/xubuntu/etc) and they may not understand ubuntu is based off debian. So like you said - they see debian but want to use Ubuntu. They go to UbuntuGIS and they see the repositories for UbuntuGIS and the choice is unstable (and no one likes unstable software) and stable (which doesn't contain the newest software). So you end up going "Use Unstable because it's stable and current". <br />> <br />></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top: 5.0pt; margin-bottom: 5.0pt;">
<pre> </pre>
<pre> </pre>
<pre> </pre>
<blockquote style="margin-top: 5.0pt; margin-bottom: 5.0pt;">
<pre>Under my /etc/apt/sources.list.d directory I made a qgis.list file</pre>
<pre>and put the following in there:</pre>
<pre> </pre>
<pre>deb <a href="http://qgis.org/debian">http://qgis.org/debian</a> xenial main</pre>
<pre>deb <a href="http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu">http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu</a> xenial main</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre> </pre>
<pre>Why? That are the packages not based on ubuntugis with the dependencies from</pre>
<pre>ubuntugis.</pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal">Do I have this wrong? I thought I had the repositories for the install correct based off the directions on qgis.org. Which I could completely have it wrong. With the above repos I'm getting QGIS 2.16.x and GDAL 2.1.x. <br />> <br />></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top: 5.0pt; margin-bottom: 5.0pt;">
<pre> </pre>
<pre> </pre>
<pre>Jürgen</pre>
<pre> </pre>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br />> <br />> <br />></p>
<pre>_______________________________________________</pre>
<pre>Qgis-user mailing list</pre>
<pre><a href="mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org</a></pre>
<pre>List info: <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a></pre>
<pre>Unsubscribe: <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br />> <br />></p>
<pre>-- </pre>
<pre>-----------------</pre>
<pre>Randal Hale</pre>
<pre>North River Geographic Systems, Inc</pre>
<pre><a href="http://www.northrivergeographic.com">http://www.northrivergeographic.com</a></pre>
<pre>423.653.3611 <a href="mailto:rjhale@northrivergeographic.com">rjhale@northrivergeographic.com</a></pre>
<pre>twitter:rjhale</pre>
</div>
<!-- PART SEPARATOR --><br /><br /><br />_______________________________________________<br />Qgis-user mailing list<br />Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org<br />List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user<br />Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</blockquote>