<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /></head><body style='font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'>
<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>From these three clients you mention, I would currently only consider QWC2. It is now in a good state and deployed in several provinces and cities as production version. Already now, QWC2 has exceeded the functionality of QWC1 and it is based on modern, up-to-date libraries and responsive. Also, QWC2 is actively in development.</p>
<p>The demo application is not because QWC2 is not in production state, but it should help you to get a start project.</p>
<p>QWC1, and I assume EQWC is based on old versions of OpenLayers and not fully responsive.</p>
<p>As Paolo mentioned, there is also Lizmap.</p>
<p>In your case, I would evaluate QWC2 and Lizmap.</p>
<p>Greetings,</p>
<p>Andreas</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p>On 2018-09-03 04:33, Christopher Gray wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<div dir="ltr">I've found 3 QGIS related web clients:
<div> </div>
<div>QGIS Web Client (QWC1)</div>
<div>QGIS Web Client 2 (QWC2)</div>
<div>Enhanced QGIS Web Client (EQWC)</div>
<div><br clear="all" />
<div>
<div class="gmail_signature">The QGIS website still references QWC1, while the QWC1 page says it is no longer maintained and suggests QWC2. The QWC2 page lists itself as a "demo application" which seems to suggest it is in-progress, but perhaps I am misinterpreting this. The EQWC page looks like a functioning option but suggests it is based on QWC1 which I understand was considered outdated... </div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_signature"> </div>
<div class="gmail_signature">EQWC seems to perform nicely (based on their demo maps), and has user and guest authentication which seems very important for map access.</div>
<div class="gmail_signature"> </div>
<div class="gmail_signature">Anyhow, which of these is considered the current "QGIS Web Client" / most appropriate to use at this time?</div>
<div class="gmail_signature"> </div>
<div class="gmail_signature">[In my specific situation, this will be my first web-client setup. I'm preparing to setup a publicly available map for my town and a private map for my family farm in the town (That will require authentication to access).]</div>
<div class="gmail_signature"> </div>
<div class="gmail_signature">Thank you, Chris</div>
</div>
<br />
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">_______________________________________________<br /> Qgis-user mailing list<br /> <a href="mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org</a><br /> List info: <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a><br /> Unsubscribe: <a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a></div>
</blockquote>
<p><br /></p>
</body></html>