<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Hi Chris,</p>
    <p>there are also other clients (e.g. LizMap). I don't think anyone
      qualifies as "official", every one has its merits and limitations.
      I agree that this should be better explained. Your suggestions
      welcome.</p>
    <p>All the best.<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/03/2018 04:33 AM, Christopher
      Gray wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPWG4dXt=RjCRnP0xSHaZjt8QpeC=Wqv2OK_mpn2WcCtJQfUPA@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <div dir="ltr">I've found 3 QGIS related web clients: 
        <div> </div>
        <div>QGIS Web Client (QWC1)</div>
        <div>QGIS Web Client 2 (QWC2)</div>
        <div>Enhanced QGIS Web Client (EQWC)</div>
        <div><br clear="all">
          <div>
            <div class="gmail_signature"
              data-smartmail="gmail_signature">The QGIS website still
              references QWC1, while the QWC1 page says it is no longer
              maintained and suggests QWC2. The QWC2 page lists itself
              as a "demo application" which seems to suggest it is
              in-progress, but perhaps I am misinterpreting this. The
              EQWC page looks like a functioning option but suggests it
              is based on QWC1 which I understand was considered
              outdated... </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">EQWC
          seems to perform nicely (based on their demo maps), and has
          user and guest authentication which seems very important for
          map access.</div>
        <div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Anyhow,
          which of these is considered the current "QGIS Web Client" /
          most appropriate to use at this time?</div>
        <div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">[In
          my specific situation, this will be my first web-client setup.
          I'm preparing to setup a publicly available map for my town
          and a private map for my family farm in the town (That will
          require authentication to access).]</div>
        <div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Thank
          you, Chris</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org</a>
List info: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a>
Unsubscribe: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Paolo Cavallini - <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.faunalia.eu">www.faunalia.eu</a>
QGIS & PostGIS courses: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html">http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis">https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>