<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I agree with all of you - there are plenty of web clients out
there that can collaborate well with QGIS server.<br>
</p>
<p>God knows why every small company is starting its "own" web
client and doesn't collaborate with the already existing ones ...
maybe it is because they are not so familiar with the frameworks
used by the other web clients (or don't like the choice of
frameworks). Maybe it is also, because it is relatively "easy" to
create something from scratch with the tools one is already
familiar with - but at the long run - I think it is a not so wise
strategy that there are so many web clients out there. It is a
fragmentation of resources. One can create something fast that
covers 80% of requirements, but the remaining 20% are often the
hardest. I am personally disappointed about this fragmentation -
and ithis fragmentation does not help the user. It helps our
commercial competitors.<br>
</p>
<p>For a web client to be "official" - in my opinion - it should be
under the QGIS.ORG github repo. So far, only "QWC2" is under the
official QGIS.ORG repo. QWC1 was also - it was the very first web
client that existed for QGIS server - but it is now deprecated.
This does not make it any better, but maybe more "official", as it
is under the control of QGIS.ORG and not by a single company. In
the case of QWC2, while Sourcepole is currently the main
contributor, there are already many other contributors who
collaborate. And who knows - in the future it might be a different
company that contributes more.<br>
</p>
<p>But it is important to show the different options that are
available and then the user who wants to find a web client, can
choose by himself.</p>
<p>Just my two cents,</p>
<p>Andreas<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 04.09.2018 um 10:43 schrieb Kari
Salovaara:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:2a583a45-5e2c-e102-ed64-4cd276464cbe@pp1.inet.fi">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
Hi Leonardo,<br>
<br>
interesting and promising project.<br>
If I understand collectly You have the possibility to localize the
user interfaces, how are You planning to do it by crowdsourcing?<br>
<br>
Cheers, Kari<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Leonardo Lami kirjoitti 4.9.2018 klo
10:22:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:39381731-9365-c43c-2135-736f6ab60504@gis3w.it">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>you can also evaluate G3W-SUITE, a framework developed in
DJango to publish and manage your QGIS projects.</p>
<p>You can find info here:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://g3wsuite.gis3w.it/en/">
https://g3wsuite.gis3w.it/en/</a></p>
<p>Manual and demo here: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://g3wsuite.gis3w.it/en/g3wsuite-demo/">https://g3wsuite.gis3w.it/en/g3wsuite-demo/</a><br>
</p>
<p>And here the GitHub repository: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://github.com/g3w-suite">https://github.com/g3w-suite</a><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Greetings</p>
<p>Leonardo<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Il 03/09/2018 22:12, Christopher
Gray ha scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPWG4dVPQgA7WguGV8xVu9kmP5cb7v_48Cu1++z7O9hmi_6SVg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
<div>Andreas, </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thank you for the description, I have taken some
more time to look into both QWC2 and Lizmap. QWC2
seems very nice [although I would like if the menu
remained showing on the larger screens.] I have a
tendency to want to use QWC2 since it is intended to
integrate with QGIS projects and appears to be in
development alongside QGIS, but Lizmap is very nice as
well.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Do you happen to know if QWC2 has any
authentication features yet? </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thank you, Chris</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:36 AM Andreas
Neumann <<a href="mailto:a.neumann@carto.net"
moz-do-not-send="true">a.neumann@carto.net</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div
style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif">
<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>From these three clients you mention, I would
currently only consider QWC2. It is now in a good
state and deployed in several provinces and cities as
production version. Already now, QWC2 has exceeded the
functionality of QWC1 and it is based on modern,
up-to-date libraries and responsive. Also, QWC2 is
actively in development.</p>
<p>The demo application is not because QWC2 is not in
production state, but it should help you to get a
start project.</p>
<p>QWC1, and I assume EQWC is based on old versions of
OpenLayers and not fully responsive.</p>
<p>As Paolo mentioned, there is also Lizmap.</p>
<p>In your case, I would evaluate QWC2 and Lizmap.</p>
<p>Greetings,</p>
<p>Andreas</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>On 2018-09-03 04:33, Christopher Gray wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding:0
0.4em;border-left:#1010ff 2px solid;margin:0">
<div dir="ltr">I've found 3 QGIS related web clients:
<div> </div>
<div>QGIS Web Client (QWC1)</div>
<div>QGIS Web Client 2 (QWC2)</div>
<div>Enhanced QGIS Web Client (EQWC)</div>
<div><br clear="all">
<div>
<div
class="m_1625951331495440819gmail_signature">The
QGIS website still references QWC1, while the
QWC1 page says it is no longer maintained and
suggests QWC2. The QWC2 page lists itself as a
"demo application" which seems to suggest it
is in-progress, but perhaps I am
misinterpreting this. The EQWC page looks like
a functioning option but suggests it is based
on QWC1 which I understand was considered
outdated... </div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="m_1625951331495440819gmail_signature"> </div>
<div class="m_1625951331495440819gmail_signature">EQWC
seems to perform nicely (based on their demo
maps), and has user and guest authentication which
seems very important for map access.</div>
<div class="m_1625951331495440819gmail_signature"> </div>
<div class="m_1625951331495440819gmail_signature">Anyhow,
which of these is considered the current "QGIS Web
Client" / most appropriate to use at this time?</div>
<div class="m_1625951331495440819gmail_signature"> </div>
<div class="m_1625951331495440819gmail_signature">[In
my specific situation, this will be my first
web-client setup. I'm preparing to setup a
publicly available map for my town and a private
map for my family farm in the town (That will
require authentication to access).]</div>
<div class="m_1625951331495440819gmail_signature"> </div>
<div class="m_1625951331495440819gmail_signature">Thank
you, Chris</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="m_1625951331495440819pre"
style="margin:0;padding:0;font-family:monospace">_______________________________________________<br>
Qgis-user mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
List info: <a
href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user"
rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a
href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user"
rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a></div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org" moz-do-not-send="true">Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org</a>
List info: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a>
Unsubscribe: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org" moz-do-not-send="true">Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org</a>
List info: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a>
Unsubscribe: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org">Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org</a>
List info: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a>
Unsubscribe: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>