[SAC] SVN/Trac VM

Alex Mandel tech_dev at wildintellect.com
Fri May 28 03:15:43 EDT 2010


christopher.schmidt at nokia.com wrote:
>> I've edited the wiki page to set the disk to 100GB, and left the RAM at 8GB, since we're still vastly under the limit for RAM. Currently, the number of CPUs is listed as 2. In general, we have anywhere from 6-8 active SVN requests, so having more CPU would probably not hurt, but I don't understand how CPUs work in this environment; I assume that we don't have to match the total 'CPUs used' on the system to the number of actual cores, and can exceed that. If someone can confirm that, I'd bump that number of virtual CPUs to 4 instead of 2.
> 
> After doing a bit of research, it looks like this assumption is correct. I'm upping the number of virtual CPUs to 4 on the Trac/SVN VM in the wiki.
> 
> So, our VM plan is:
> 
>  * 100GB of disk (~20GB for SVN, 15GB for system, leaves with a factor-of-3-growth space for SVN) 
>  * 8GB RAM (ram is cheap in this case)
>  * 4 CPUs
> 
> If anyone has an objection to this plan for the Trac/SVN VM, or other comments to make, please do so in the next 24 hours. (If you need more time to formulate a realistic response, just say so.) If not, then I hope Alex (or someone else?) can work with OSUOSL to set up the new VM tomorrow, so that work can begin on the transition this weekend.
> 
> Regards,

As some may have heard, this VM is up and ready. Are we on for migrating
Trac/SVN this weekend. Some users in the community have asked that we
send out a notice of potential downtime, or the time window in which
commits may be lost and should not be attempted.

Thanks,
Alex


More information about the Sac mailing list